I think the angle may be accentuating the torso to make it look longer. Made my femurs look long and tibs super short when I took from the wrong angle too.
Have never seen a body like this ever in your first photo, makes me think it's the angle. Stand further away from the mirror with the camera level instead of facing down and take another picture.
Quote from: NewHeights on September 26, 2015, 02:59:03 PMThis guy can lengthen 20 CM and still have a better I/H than me. He basically has the torso of a 6' 1" man
I guess my physique is rather thin and slender. It's really not that long so maybe it's the angles
Quote from: Taller on September 26, 2015, 05:05:09 PMHow tall are you when sitting down with your back against a wall?
Because, judging from the first picture, it looks like you'd look even better than you do now if you lengthened 20 CM! I've never seen anyone else I could say that for. Post more pictures, though. I've got a feeling your legs aren't actually as short as the first picture makes them look.
Just measured, 93cm. weird since that doesn't add up when if I'm 168 :S
Maybe the first photo is misleading. I'll post another photo
Quote from: KiloKAHN on September 26, 2015, 05:13:50 PMI think the angle may be accentuating the torso to make it look longer. Made my femurs look long and tibs super short when I took from the wrong angle too.
You're right, I'll get a different angle
Quote from: theuprising on September 26, 2015, 05:46:48 PMHave never seen a body like this ever in your first photo, makes me think it's the angle. Stand further away from the mirror with the camera level instead of facing down and take another picture.
Ok there we go now it doesn't look ridiculous mate...Taking pics from the belly button to waist area is key for determining torso to legs.
Anyways...yeah I'd say your still rather long torso'd compared to your legs. The real limitation I see for you would be your wingspan in comparison to you height. May I ask what it is? If it was just up to torso and legs I'd say you could do 10 cm (5 cm in each).
Quote from: Alu on September 27, 2015, 02:15:23 AMOk there we go now it doesn't look ridiculous mate...Taking pics from the belly button to waist area is key for determining torso to legs.
Anyways...yeah I'd say your still rather long torso'd compared to your legs. The real limitation I see for you would be your wingspan in comparison to you height. May I ask what it is? If it was just up to torso and legs I'd say you could do 10 cm (5 cm in each).
Oh right, Thank you sir I'll remember that.
Just measured my wingspan to be 170cm
Wow, you really have a long torso man. I mean 93/168= 0.55 (the average is 0.52).
So you can easily lengthen 10 cm and still be proportioned because 93/178= 0.52. It seems like you were born for ll mate 
Quote from: Cloudo on September 27, 2015, 08:24:25 AMWow, you really have a long torso man. I mean 93/168= 0.55 (the average is 0.52).
So you can easily lengthen 10 cm and still be proportioned because 93/178= 0.52. It seems like you were born for ll mate
Thanks for your valuable input!
Wow you are exactly 2 inches taller than me and I think my legs are longer than yours. To avoid 2 surgeries I will definetly lengthen 6.5-7 on femurs and go on from there.
But LL is definitely for you
You must be logged in to post a reply.
