Hey guys, I threw some mocks together (+~5cm; I'm 176). I feel like the elongated tibias look substantially better but I am heavily in favor of femurs via precise 2 for practical reasons. Curious about your thoughts - can I get away with femurs?
Cheers.
https://imgur.com/a/aHKRpsH
Posted on Dec 21, 2022, 10:40 pm
#1
Posted on Dec 21, 2022, 10:56 pm
#2
Wingspan is 186 (yikes).
Posted on Dec 22, 2022, 12:46 am
#3
You have a short torso to begin with. I think that tibias in your case indeed look better.
Try to post a pic with boxers as your very defind obliques make your femurs look much longer
Posted on Dec 22, 2022, 1:04 pm
#4
I almost see no difference between the first two.
Posted on Dec 23, 2022, 3:50 am
#5
Tibia looks better IMO
Posted on Feb 6, 2023, 9:57 pm
#6
Quote from: RealLostSoul on December 22, 2022, 01:04:05 PMI almost see no difference between the first two.
Yes m2.
Posted on Feb 6, 2023, 11:01 pm
#7
Tibias will always look better 3-5 cm range.
Problem is as always the added complication of the fibular.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How much lengthening can I do before looking disproportionate ?
Goofy
3 replies • 2 hours ago
Head circumference to height ratio
NotTallEnough
1 replies • 2 hours ago
someone needs to stop tremba
account03
17 replies • 2 hours ago
Proportions after limb lengthining
Achieverr
6 replies • 2 hours ago
Severe Proportions Neurosis Post LL
GC Quad
16 replies • 2 weeks ago