On proportions: This guy is technically below average height

Edit Post

https://www.celebheights.com/s/Colin-Ford-49058.html

Just goes to show you how having a long neck, small head, long torso can make you seem much taller than you really are.

(lol inb4 BodyBuilder comes in here and says women are not attracted to skinny men like this and that they are complete jokes)



I would guess this guy to be 6'1'ish honestly. Never would imagine he'd be 5'9.75, which is technically below the average of 5'10.4.

Meanwhile, a guy like Jason Statham at 5'8.75 is only one inch shorter than him, but rather, looks like he'd be at least 4 inches shorter.



So weird to think about. Can you imagine them standing together and only having an inch in separation of height between them?

Edit Post

its the clothes. jason is wearing non-fitting clothes all over the body p.s with a bad posture.

Edit Post

One has better proportion, second worse. We can't do anything with that. I'm at 178 with long legs but my proportion is like 175 guy around. For example I have seen boys at 200+ and they looked shorter, also I have seen guy at 184-5cm around who had that much impressive proportion that if I would see him on pic I would say 195 comfortably.

Edit Post

It’s interesting because I’m 177.8 with short legs 76 cm inseam which is below what my height should be not by much but it’s still below so short legs me lol I’m more torso than legs which isn’t bad for LL

Edit Post

Quote from: Racurz on November 08, 2018, 02:35:47 PMIt’s interesting because I’m 177.8 with short legs 76 cm inseam which is below what my height should be not by much but it’s still below so short legs me lol I’m more torso than legs which isn’t bad for LL

Do you think you’d still want LL if you had the proportions in the OP? I don’t think he would look short or be considered short by ANYONE in real life, or receive different treatment based on his size. I also can’t imagine he’d be treated much differently if his legs were suddenly 3 inches longer.

Also you’re already taller than 95% of 20-39 white women, and we all know how it’s not easily discernible to determine how much taller than you someone is, especially when they pass the 3+ inch mark (women are notoriously bad at this). So I don’t think the majority of women would suddenly see you as being that much taller either.

Edit Post

Quote from: Racurz on November 08, 2018, 02:35:47 PMIt’s interesting because I’m 177.8 with short legs 76 cm inseam which is below what my height should be not by much but it’s still below so short legs me lol I’m more torso than legs which isn’t bad for LL

Are you sure you've measured your inseam properly? At your height it should be at least 80 cm.

Edit Post

Quote from: ivan on November 08, 2018, 06:28:41 PMAre you sure you've measured your inseam properly? At your height it should be at least 80 cm.

Positive done it 4 times and every time it was that keep in mind though inseam is only measured to your ankle

Edit Post

That's the correct way:

Edit Post

Quote from: ivan on November 09, 2018, 11:13:26 AMThat's the correct way:



https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/how-does-one-measure-inseam-to-the-top-of-foot-or-right-to-the-floor-need-pants.1277928/

This is where I got my measuring information from plus there’s lots of videos on it and they state the same to the ankle because if you bought pants all the way to the floor they’d be clearly too long

Edit Post

I think you are confusing pants inseam with real inseam.