MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Oct 2, 2021, 4:34 am
#21

to be honest my new prediction is that nanobots will have affordable reverse aging by 2045.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 2, 2021, 4:35 am
#22

we still need to undestand how our brain works for that type of social AI

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 2, 2021, 4:39 am
#23

well i think that there is a possibility to get a humanoid robot that looks like us by 2038. My new theory is 2045 for the social AI to be perfected.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 2, 2021, 5:01 am
#24

Quote from: stevens on October 02, 2021, 04:34:24 AMto be honest my new prediction is that nanobots will have affordable reverse aging by 2045.

Is nanobots available now in some hospitals?

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 2, 2021, 6:49 am
#25

Quote from: stevens on October 02, 2021, 04:39:04 AMwell i think that there is a possibility to get a humanoid robot that looks like us by 2038. My new theory is 2045 for the social AI to be perfected.

That kinda reminds me of a game " Detroit: Become Human."

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 2, 2021, 4:19 pm
#26

Quote from: ilovescience on October 02, 2021, 05:01:59 AMIs nanobots available now in some hospitals?

There are no nanobots anywhere.  For 40 years they've been in development but nobody can figure out how to make them.  You can't build them like a normal robot because they're too small; getting a few atoms to stick together like that has to be done though chemistry.  Read what Richard Smalley has to say about them.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 2, 2021, 7:17 pm
#27

Quote from: Medium Drink Of Water on October 02, 2021, 04:19:04 PMThere are no nanobots anywhere.  For 40 years they've been in development but nobody can figure out how to make them.  You can't build them like a normal robot because they're too small; getting a few atoms to stick together like that has to be done though chemistry.  Read what Richard Smalley has to say about them.

If we wanted to help humanity reach some dream like antiaging, would we need nanobots do the job?

And if we mastered nanobots, would they help a lot to people wanting LL?

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 3, 2021, 12:14 am
#28

Quote from: ilovescience on October 02, 2021, 07:17:45 PMIf we wanted to help humanity reach some dream like antiaging, would we need nanobots do the job?
I don't know.  The problem with aging is nobody has a complete understanding of what it even is.  Without knowing what the problem is it's difficult to guess what the solution would be.

QuoteAnd if we mastered nanobots, would they help a lot to people wanting LL?
Yes and no.  They would help anyone do anything; LL would become irrelevant.  Mastery of molecular assembly would be a bigger change to life on planet earth than the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs, and that is not an exaggeration.  It would allow for godlike power over matter from the subatomic level to solar system level.  By itself it wouldn't be enough for us to to do anything interstellar and beyond, or give us a better understanding of what lies at the submolecular level of matter.  Although that last part might be needed to perform molecular assembly in the first place.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 3, 2021, 1:05 am
#29

Quote from: Medium Drink Of Water on October 03, 2021, 12:14:30 AMI don't know.  The problem with aging is nobody has a complete understanding of what it even is.  Without knowing what the problem is it's difficult to guess what the solution would be.

Yes and no.  They would help anyone do anything; LL would become irrelevant.  Mastery of molecular assembly would be a bigger change to life on planet earth than the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs, and that is not an exaggeration.  It would allow for godlike power over matter from the subatomic level to solar system level.  By itself it wouldn't be enough for us to to do anything interstellar and beyond, or give us a better understanding of what lies at the submolecular level of matter.  Although that last part might be needed to perform molecular assembly in the first place.

Guess we still have a long way to go before we conquer aging. We conquered height last century, before that people thought once a person done growing taller, that's it. But we were able to change so shorter could have a second chance of growing. Probably we'll be able to conquer aging this century.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 4, 2021, 4:13 am
#30

by the way i love science. detroit become humans, the whole game has a secret ending where they show that Kamski (creator of the androids) created the deviants and that they had no autonomy.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics