Since external lengthens along the mechanical axis and internal along the anatomical axis (ragarding femurs since in tibia its the same),how does the LoN method lengthen?
1)Is it along the anatomical or mechanical axis?
Also:2)Is the LoN method capable of correcting any possible misalignment?
3)Since with the LoN method one still has to go through the knee, risking permanent knee pain, is it better to do tibia with classic Illizarov or TSF full external frames?
Thank you for any answers!
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Feb 14, 2022, 4:52 pm
#1
Posted on Feb 14, 2022, 6:20 pm
#2
1. Anatomical, otherwise you'd get a weird bend in the bone
2. Yes, because the internal nail isn't attached on both sides of the break yet, and the nail isn't big enough itself to block the correction of misalignments.
3. Yes.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 4 weeks ago