MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Oct 21, 2016, 2:43 am
#1

Currently my leg/height ratios is 45%. After my desired lengthening of two segments it will be 47.86%.
The average is 45-48% is this enough to worry about?

surgery one: 169cm - 174cm (5cm in femurs) will = 46.66%
[potential] surgery two - would bring my ratio to 47.86% adding 4cm to the tibias.

Quote from: midnightninja on October 21, 2016, 03:47:36 AM  76.2
--------- x 100 = 45%   This is my ratio currently.
  169

Surgery one:

 81.2
--------- x 100 = 46.66%
174

surgery two:

 85.2
--------- x 100 = 47.86%
 178

I think this is the correct way to work out my end ratio. Is this correct?

Also, my wingspan is the exact same as my height.. I am 169 and my wingspan is 169.1cm ... I thought wingspans were meant to be longer.

age: 19
Inseam: 30inches (76.2)
Sitting height: 35inches (88.9)
Wingspan: 66.6inches (169.1cm)
Height: 5'6.5 ( I go by 5'7  Should I be concerned about this? (Am i calculating my limb ratio correctly?) )

I plan on doing either 4-5cm on my femurs (probably 4cm) and potentially 4cm on my tibias later on.

My goal height is to be 5'9 (175cm) I would be forever thankful if I can reach 5'10 (177cm). 

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 21, 2016, 3:47 am
#2

I'll do that tonight. Do you know if I'm calculating the ratio right?

  76.2
--------- x 100 = 45%   This is my ratio currently.
  169

Surgery one:

 81.2
--------- x 100 = 46.66%
174

surgery two:

 85.2
--------- x 100 = 47.86%
 178

I think this is the correct way to work out my end ratio. Is this correct?

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 21, 2016, 8:22 am
#3

I just measured my navel to feet and the measurement is 38inches (96.52cm)

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 21, 2016, 11:04 pm
#4

Quote from: YourSpaceBoyfriend on October 21, 2016, 11:57:05 AMBut 89 sitting height at 5'7 is not much doe... someone who has shorter sitting height than me and is 5'11 lol.

What do you mean by shorter sitting height then you? Are you saying I would have a shorter sitting height than you at 5'10 or someone you have seen/read about on here?

Quote from: NoRegrets on October 21, 2016, 01:06:32 PMI'd say that 89cm sitting height at 169cm is about average.

I've just started the gym and a bulking phase as well so my upper body will gain more muscled and width which could look better in the end.

Quote from: onemorefoot on October 21, 2016, 06:07:02 PMYou did a correct measurement, my navel height is 102 cm, someone in the old forum said that he had 109 cm navel height at 176 cm with 93 cm of sitting height, that doesnt make sense, even I could say that your navel height is 97-98 cm. Your height 169.1 cm is in the morning or afternoon??I have a doubt if you are taller than someone in the sitting height are you taller in the legs, too orcan be just in one section?

My navel to feet length is 96.59cm. I think I am average in sitting height and the same for legs.
I'm not really sure what you mean by your comment.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 22, 2016, 3:12 am
#5

Yeah I'm skinny, I'm in the beginning stages of a bulk but my waist is 32"

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 22, 2016, 3:16 am
#6

I do have a short torso. I think I will aim for 175cm and leave it at that.

However, I am starting the gym so I don't know if developing my upper body in terms of muscle and bulk will make my proportions some what better when partnered with LL.

 I know that with bodybuilding in particular your lats grow,chest and traps grow which could potentially make my torso look a lot more bigger and built.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 22, 2016, 3:56 am
#7

Thanks for the reassuarance onemorefoot, I don't mind having long legs after the surgery I just don't want very long legs!

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics