Quote from: Coeus on January 13, 2021, 11:33:09 PMSorry for my blindness.
The article itself showed this following statement:
'Once again, success has more to do with our ability to be bold enough to be proactive, to think and act differently, and to step up to the plate than is does with outside attributes.'
And if you've really carefully read this article,you should pay attention to these sentences:
'"Controlling for teen height essentially eliminates the effect of adult height on wages," they wrote. "The teen height premium is not explained by differences in resources or endowments."
In other words, how tall you are now actually has nothing to do with how much money you will earn; it's how tall you were in high school that matters.
Notably, the economists found that height as a pre-teen or child did not correlate to future success. Only during those crucial, awful, self-conscious pubescent years where we struggle to "find ourselves" does height play a pivotal role in our future earnings.
The crucial difference between more and less successful people, it appears, is not height, but what height bestows at age 15: confidence. And just like getting started in sports early correlates to higher chances of professional success, a confident teenager will do more, get more, and be more confident at age 40 than an anxious one.'
,which means the reason why taller people can earn more money is that when they were pubescent,they felt confident cuz of their heights.Thus they could perform better in academy and socialization.So if height didn't bother you so much in your adolescence,why you should unplease yourself with this article?
This is key.
The height matters ONLY within the context of character development etc. AKA the tall kids in high school were rewarded for their height which is just a generally-awesome springboard for opportunities in life vs. those who are short/ugly and have a much much different experience in high school.
I am regretting sparing my time on browsing several pages of Offtopic and I happened to see you polio cunt for one more time.
Are you fond of harassments or spamming?
Either harassments or craps like this,I have seen them for several times and I'm really doubting admins and mods' authoritative efficacies.
Why didn't they give you a 'justice punch' and shut your mouth?
Also I'm really having enough of incel theory such as short guys in general are more poor than tall guys.
It's correlation, not causation, as the title suggests.
If it's causation, then African Americans would be the richest, and Asian Americans would be the poorest in USA. Reality is the opposite.
The article also concludes that the reason for the income difference is confidence from being taller at a young age.
The study is controlled for your height in high school, meaning that unless you're 16, LL will not make you richer.
Quote from: SirStretchAlot on September 03, 2021, 11:31:33 AMIt's correlation, not causation, as the title suggests.
If it's causation, then African Americans would be the richest, and Asian Americans would be the poorest in USA. Reality is the opposite.
The article also concludes that the reason for the income difference is confidence from being taller at a young age.
The study is controlled for your height in high school, meaning that unless you're 16, LL will not make you richer.
This cerebral palsy wretch was just selective about statements addressed in this article and by his elaborations,he was misleading short guys to think I'm too short so I'm doomed to earn less money no matter what I do.
Let's say he is just a poor incel and psychopath.
Quote from: SirStretchAlot on September 03, 2021, 11:31:33 AMIt's correlation, not causation, as the title suggests.
If it's causation, then African Americans would be the richest, and Asian Americans would be the poorest in USA. Reality is the opposite.
The article also concludes that the reason for the income difference is confidence from being taller at a young age.
The study is controlled for your height in high school, meaning that unless you're 16, LL will not make you richer.
I do understand what you meant, lol, after LL Being over 6' 1m845.5 I feel like the whole new person, confidence is through the roof and ready to do anything, before it was bad bad bad. Being short is sucked
Quote from: dexter1930 on September 03, 2021, 11:57:15 AMI do understand what you meant, lol, after LL Being over 6' 1m845.5 I feel like the whole new person, confidence is through the roof and ready to do anything, before it was bad bad bad. Being short is sucked
Exactly and that's why numerous LLers volunteer to do LL.What this incel article is talking about is just what you said.
Height is the causation of earnings and the determinant of personalities,which are the criminal resulting in high or low earnings.
End of story let's get over this stupid topic.
You must be logged in to post a reply.