As I read I'm understanding it. A very wide range of knowledge
Crural index=tibia/femur=TML/FBL.
TML (Tibia Maximum Length)= distance from the superior articular surface of the lateral condyle to the tip of the medial malleolus.
FBL (Femur Bicondylar Length)= distance from the most superior part of the head to a plane drawn along the inferior surfaces of the dystale condyles.
Neanderthal Man had a crural index of about 78; Homo Ergaster had a crural index of about 88.5.
Today the lowest crural index is found in the Lapps and it's about 79; in recent Europeans the lowest value is about 80 (mean of 82.8 minus 2.5 of standard deviation); in west africans is at its highest level: mean of 85.8 plus 2.5 of standard deviation.
Generally speaking femur is 52-56% of your totally leg length
Zaney,
If you solve the system you obtain the values above indicated. Where is the mistake in your opinion?
Let's assume that x+y=1 meter
Solving the system, in which the crural index=0.78, you get y=femur=0,56m, that related to the total length of the legs (1m) means 56%.
Same thing if you sole the system, by taking into consideration the crural index=88.5, you get 0.53m, that means y=femurs=53% of the total length of the legs, that is 1.
You must be logged in to post a reply.