Everyone will be able to spot the one who lengthened 3-4 inches right away. There is no way you can hide even 3 inches, when you take pictures next to a person who has the same height naturally (in underwear or at the beach).
Your arms will be shorter, your shoulders will be narrower in 90% of the cases, your hands and feet will be smaller and your torso will look shorter too.
Quote from: Alittletooshort on December 15, 2015, 09:54:59 AMEveryone will be able to spot the one who lengthened 3-4 inches right away. There is no way you can hide even 3 inches, when you take pictures next to a person who has the same height naturally (in underwear or at the beach).
Your arms will be shorter, your shoulders will be narrower in 90% of the cases, your hands and feet will be smaller and your torso will look shorter too.
Before you found out about this forum you never paid attention to proportions, don't BS yourself. And everyone, as in the other 7 billion other people on this earth who doesn't know about LL, for sure they can spot an LLer huh.
Okay, I'll agree 4 inches one segment is too much, but plenty have done 3 inches to varying degrees of aesthetics, especially if you have short femurs to begin with. And those who do 10cm across 2 segments? I've seen a few in shorts and they look fantastic.
Let's reuse my example from one of the previous threads: Briana Banks (adult star) is 5'10 with 36" inseam. For comparison, people in the 6'4+ range have 36" inseams. So lets just say she lengthened 6 inches on her legs. In this photo she's even wearing heels so lets raise it to 8 inches lengthened for fun.
Her legs are natural.. no wait, everyone can tell she did LL, she'd better hide them. Her ratios exist naturally in the human population, so stop tormenting yourself and others by becoming a proportion expert.
Quote from: Deads on December 15, 2015, 04:56:12 AMWow. He looks like crap after 4 inches. I'm doing 9cm haha...
Lol Deads. "4 inches is ugly, 3.55 inches is just right!"
Quote from: PatientZero on December 15, 2015, 10:47:42 AM
Let's reuse my example from one of the previous threads: Briana Banks
Yes! Let's!
And while we're at it.. any future discussion on this topic is to use similar content.
.... Wait what did you just say? 36" inseam on a 5"10 frame? Patientzero, DO NOT post pictures of beautiful women on here unless they have perfect proportions! We are a community that hold ourselves to a higher standard and what you have just posted is quite utterly disgusting. I'm sure many others on here will agree! I mean, how did she ever make it in the adult industry with such imperfections??! It's truly baffling.
Quote from: PatientZero on December 15, 2015, 10:53:23 AMLol Deads. "4 inches is ugly, 3.55 inches is just right!"
Hahaha! Clearly 0.45 of an inch is the difference between night and day!
Quote from: PatientZero on December 15, 2015, 10:47:42 AMLet's reuse my example from one of the previous threads: Briana Banks (adult star) is 5'10 with 36" inseam. For comparison, people in the 6'4+ range have 36" inseams. So lets just say she lengthened 6 inches on her legs. In this photo she's even wearing heels so lets raise it to 8 inches lengthened for fun.
Her legs are natural.. no wait, everyone can tell she did LL, she'd better hide them. Her ratios exist naturally in the human population, so stop tormenting yourself and others by becoming a proportion expert.
The thing is her other limbs are proportional to her overall appearance. Her arms are clearly not shorter by any means. At the same time, let's face it we are more inclined to find women with long legs to be attractive. Also, I question how she measured he inseam considering most people just go with the pants size and not the crotch to floor-barefooted method this community should and is accustomed to use.
Find me a naturally long legged guy with an inseam to height ratio that is (or seems) to be 46-48% and I, along with others here, will be able to sleep soundly; I myself don't care much about arm length anymore considering that I'm going to keep an Ape Index -2 inches (which is natural, albeit it sparse). 
Anderson Silva legs look longer then his entire body at some angles.
Quote from: PatientZero on December 15, 2015, 10:47:42 AMBefore you found out about this forum you never paid attention to proportions, don't BS yourself. And everyone, as in the other 7 billion other people on this earth who doesn't know about LL, for sure they can spot an LLer huh.
Okay, I'll agree 4 inches one segment is too much, but plenty have done 3 inches to varying degrees of aesthetics, especially if you have short femurs to begin with. And those who do 10cm across 2 segments? I've seen a few in shorts and they look fantastic
Perhaps we have a different definition of fantastic but I'havent seen any fantastic looking LL'ers yet (after 3 inches) and I doubt that I will anytime soon.
Of course most people will not pay attention to this but it will be visible!
The picture you posted shows a long legged women in heigh heels! You can't compare her to any one of us here, first of all shes a woman, men with legs this long aren't that attractive. The next thing you didn't think about is that her frame and overall proportions are still proprtionate for someone 5'10. Her shoulders have a normal size, her feet and hands have a normal size and most importantly her arms aren't short!
No one who started at 168 could look like that after 10cm's.
Patient Zero can you link some pics to the LL patients who looked great after 10cm. I want to believe!
Quote from: theuprising on December 16, 2015, 02:12:26 AMPatient Zero can you link some pics to the LL patients who looked great after 10cm. I want to believe!
Sorry, my opinions are based on my experiences consulting with docs in the US & Europe where I saw two quadrilateral cases. Also, one of the guys staying in the same complex here is also a quad patient, not sure how much he's gained to date but I wish I was him!
Quote from: Alu on December 15, 2015, 05:17:44 PMThe thing is her other limbs are proportional to her overall appearance. Her arms are clearly not shorter by any means. At the same time, let's face it we are more inclined to find women with long legs to be attractive. Also, I question how she measured he inseam considering most people just go with the pants size and not the crotch to floor-barefooted method this community should and is accustomed to use.
Yeah, it helps that she has long arms to match, but just look at where her belly button is. Doesn't need a tape measure to show her legs are longer than normal.
You must be logged in to post a reply.