Posted on Jun 28, 2018, 8:33 pm
#1
look at this guy ,he is just 5 ft 11 and looked pretty tall!
Posted on Jun 28, 2018, 8:58 pm
#2
For obvious reasons.
Posted on Jul 4, 2018, 2:30 am
#3
Meanwhile, this guy is also 5'11 and looks pretty short.
Seems to me like neck, chest length and torso width are the holy grail in not having that boxy manlet look.
Seems to me like neck, chest length and torso width are the holy grail in not having that boxy manlet look.
Posted on Jul 4, 2018, 9:04 am
#4
Quote from: YungGud on June 28, 2018, 08:33:50 PMlook at this guy ,he is just 5 ft 11 and looked pretty tall!
That's because 5'11" IS pretty tall lol. You're above average height for any type of male in USA if you're 5'11"
Posted on Jul 4, 2018, 10:14 am
#5
Quote from: CaptainAmerica on July 04, 2018, 02:30:06 AMMeanwhile, this guy is also 5'11 and looks pretty short.
Seems to me like neck, chest length and torso width are the holy grail in not having that boxy manlet look.
Let's also not play for the other side the coin here.
He doesn't look short. He just gives off an appearance of weakness. You can just look at his legs and tell he's not short.
Posted on Jul 4, 2018, 2:41 pm
#6
Quote from: YungGud on June 28, 2018, 08:33:50 PMlook at this guy ,he is just 5 ft 11 and looked pretty tall!Tall but ugly. He is so skinny that even if he was 2 inches shorter he would still look tall. The scrawny ugly type of tall, the one that even women find unattractive.
Posted on Jul 4, 2018, 2:49 pm
#7
Quote from: YungGud on June 28, 2018, 08:33:50 PMlook at this guy ,he is just 5 ft 11 and looked pretty tall!
Didn't find any Shawn O'Malley, only Sean.
Posted on Jul 4, 2018, 9:37 pm
#8
Quote from: myloginacc on July 04, 2018, 02:49:05 PMDidn't find any Shawn O'Malley, only Sean.yup ,i have been mistaken ,Sean
Posted on Jul 5, 2018, 12:37 am
#9
Quote from: Body Builder on July 04, 2018, 02:41:16 PMTall but ugly. He is so skinny that even if he was 2 inches shorter he would still look tall. The scrawny ugly type of tall, the one that even women find unattractive.
Yep, some people aren't born with the frame they just have the height. Even if he lifted alot he's still very narrow and genetics can't be changed. That's why we have to constantly remind ourselves that LL won't fix everything.
Posted on Jul 5, 2018, 9:39 am
#10
Quote from: Johnson1111 on July 05, 2018, 12:37:09 AMYep, some people aren't born with the frame they just have the height. Even if he lifted alot he's still very narrow and genetics can't be changed. That's why we have to constantly remind ourselves that LL won't fix everything.Right.
My point is that height is not everything. That man would be better if he was more muscular even if he seemed a little shorter. That scrawny look, although it makes you appear taller, is completely unattractive and for women, being so thin is about as unattractive as being short.
To have an attractive body you should not only have to be above average height (or close to that) but you should have a manly body too.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Is 30-32 too old to do LL?
..
7 replies • 0 seconds ago
How quickly do you shrink to your evening height?
AlmostSix
10 replies • 1 second ago
Beware sxxual predators in LL
angryfem
3 replies • 10 seconds ago
Do away with the lockdowns or still keep them for COVID?
Minkowski
3 replies • 11 seconds ago
Somebofy tried ouy LSJL???
Astronomy
6 replies • 15 seconds ago