What does it look like to have a inseam height ratio of 50.5/100?

Edit Post

Well, my inseam is 82 cm , SH is 83-85 i can't measure correctly, height is 168 , how will i look like at 178 cm (5 femur 5 tibia)?

Edit Post

Quote from: abdoali5672 on September 11, 2018, 03:11:58 PMWell, my inseam is 82 cm , SH is 83-85 i can't measure correctly, height is 168 , how will i look like at 178 cm (5 femur 5 tibia)?

Put it like this I have an inseam of 78 and I’m 5’10 so if I had your inseam then I’d be 5’11-6’0 lol life really isn’t fair 😂

Edit Post

Pump

Edit Post

Quote from: abdoali5672 on September 11, 2018, 03:11:58 PMWell, my inseam is 82 cm , SH is 83-85 i can't measure correctly, height is 168 , how will i look like at 178 cm (5 femur 5 tibia)?
82 inseam at newly discovered 5'9 crew checking in,op you would look very disproportionate,with an added 10cm's of leg length.6'4 leg length at 5'10 pretty much.

Edit Post

You are already inside the spectrum of long legs but in the limit of the medio nivel and long leg.
168cm height for sewing 82cm you are on legs: torso = 48:52
At 10cm you stay in
178cm high for sewing 92cm
their ratio lies in (legs: torso = 51:49) which is still within normal for the standard long legs there are many people with this relationship.

just to leave a comparison I have
178cm high for sewing 83cm
my relationship is legs: torso = 46:54
if I do 7cm femur I go to legs: torso = 48:52 which is the beginning of the long legs spectrum

Edit Post

Quote from: Racurz on September 11, 2018, 07:30:19 PMPut it like this I have an inseam of 78 and I’m 5’10 so if I had your inseam then I’d be 5’11-6’0 lol life really isn’t fair 😂

78cm of true inseam ?  crotch to floor not crotch to ankle ?

for comparison mine is 76.5cm, 171 cm height

Edit Post

Quote from: JON SNOW on September 14, 2018, 04:13:40 PM78cm of true inseam ?  crotch to floor not crotch to ankle ?

for comparison mine is 76.5cm, 171 cm height

To floor yeah I have short legs for my height

Edit Post

Is an inseam slightly over 50% even that bad? After I'm finished I'll be somewhere around 49.2-50% Atm I'm at 45.6%.

Edit Post

That would look bad, yes. Anything over 48% looks bad.

Edit Post

Ignore what these people say. You will look normal. Proportions are bs. There's been so many studies to show that. If anything, I recently saw a study of women finding the man with a longer lower body compared to upper body more attractive than a man who is exactly the same size but more proportionate.

Long legs gets you the ladies. (evolution bro)

If you look weird to yourself, instead of wearing your trousers and boxers just below the belly button, wear them around pubic range. This is a good 10-20cm difference depending how your body. (Athletic looking men tend to do this anyways, shows the V).

You can literally gain 15cm in height and keep the same proportions as before by adjusting your clothes. Thought enough people would know that from wearing lifts/elevator shoes alone.