MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 12:49 am
#11

Quote from: Big Daddy on March 21, 2017, 09:50:54 PMGetting paid and getting laid instead of whining that I'm not 6'5" like some beta phaggot XD


Only  time I have agreed with big daddy troll.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 1:50 am
#12

Quote from: Bigpoppapump on March 22, 2017, 12:23:01 AMIt's not harder to be built if you are tall that's a complete myth. You're body type determines your muscle mass not your height. If I had a pound for every time I hear this crap I'd be rich by now

Genes play the biggest role but most of the times the taller you are the most difficult it is to put and keep some good muscles.

That's why the vast majority of bbers are from 5.5 to 5.11 ft.
And if we talk about the best of them (mr Olympias) only one of them was more than 5.11 and almost all of the greatest were 5.8 to 5.10.

So it is not comoletely a myth. Genes are the most important thing but for the average people it is harder to put muscles if you are tall, especially very tall.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 9:22 am
#13

Testosterone plays the biggest role in getting and maintaining muscles.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 10:06 am
#14

6 ft2 is great height by any means.It's legit tall but not stand out tall like 6 ft 3+ ,also great for dating closely  no one girl will be taller than you even with heel on

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 7:34 pm
#15

Quote from: Bigpoppapump on March 22, 2017, 12:23:01 AMIt's not harder to be built if you are tall that's a complete myth. You're body type determines your muscle mass not your height. If I had a pound for every time I hear this crap I'd be rich by now

yes but generally,
short wingspan = easier  to look muscular
long wingspan = harder to look muscular

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 10:35 pm
#16

I personally wouldn't go over 5'11 or 6'0 since I've a slight fetish for tall women lol. Finding a girl taller than me even when I would be 5'11/6'0 would be hot.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 11:32 pm
#17

Quote from: TheLichKing on March 22, 2017, 10:35:06 PMI personally wouldn't go over 5'11 or 6'0 since I've a slight fetish for tall women lol. Finding a girl taller than me even when I would be 5'11/6'0 would be hot.


We have the opposite fetish lol. For me it is ideal to tower over women

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 11:38 pm
#18

I don't really care, lol. My gf could be 140 cm or 180 (that is, after I get my LL haha).

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 11:49 pm
#19

Quote from: 0184946 on March 22, 2017, 11:32:39 PMWe have the opposite fetish lol. For me it is ideal to tower over women


Yes me too, in the sense I'd not like to be towered at my current height. It's while being in an ideal male height range (5'10-6'1), to put it better: being dominated while being dominating height-wise. I'd chase after that goddess;)

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 22, 2017, 11:58 pm
#20

Quote from: TheLichKing on March 22, 2017, 11:49:44 PMYes me too, in the sense I'd not like to be towered at my current height. It's while being in an ideal male height range (5'10-6'0), to put it better: being dominated while being dominating height-wise. I'd chase after that goddess;)


Yeah true 5'10-6'0 are definitely comfortable heights to be in. But its quite rare for a female to be taller than that. They're out there though.  My ex gf is a maybe strong 5'7.5-8 and she looked quite tall to me but it fit her perfectly it was kinda hot needless to say though I wore boots around her all the time lol

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics