What's your inseam to height ratio?

Edit Post

Quote from: Uppland on March 26, 2015, 12:44:26 PMRight and that's exactly what you do when you wear 3CM shoes. There seems to be kind of a cutoff at 48% because when I wear long pants and walk on my toes (+7-8CM) My proportions look surprisingly good, but when I add shoes to that I start to look pretty awkward.

48% is the upper bound of the normal range, but 49% should be the absolute cutoff IMO. If I decide to do CLL, I will not go passed 180CM, as that will keep me just under 49%

Edit Post

 After 7cm's my ratio would be 46,2% so my inseam to height would be 86 to 186 in cm.
I guess I could go to 186 without having weird proportions, my wingspan to height ratio would be -3 then. How far can you go above the wingspan in terms oft height?

Edit Post

No consensus about wingspan, mine is naturally 4CM shorter than my height.

Edit Post

Quote from: Alittletooshort on March 26, 2015, 02:04:34 PM After 7cm's my ratio would be 46,2% so my inseam to height would be 86 to 186 in cm.
I guess I could go to 186 without having weird proportions, my wingspan to height ratio would be -3 then. How far can you go above the wingspan in terms oft height?

You are good with wingspan dude. After -1 inch ape index is where you may run into problems, but I doubt you want to lengthen over 11CM.

Based on your current inseam/height and wingspan, I can't think of a better candidate for CLL, as you will look more proportional after. MDOW has an insane 42% inseam/height before lengthening, so he was also a great candidate

Still, I don't think people are measuring true (cycling) inseam correctly, as it seems unlikely that nearly every respondant has a 45% or less inseam/height.

Edit Post

Hi,

My inseam: 82cm
Height : 170.5cm
Sitting height: 88cm
Wing span: 182cm (I have broad shoulders)

My inseam to height ratio is 48%. I just want to do 4cm which will put me to 49.2%. would I look odd with proportions at 49.2%?  I wear 3cm heel and perfectly look normal.

Am I measuring my inseam correctly? I measured exactly as mentioned here. It seams my inseam and sitting height make up my total height( 82+88=170)?

Edit Post

I have a 27 inch inseam and I'm 67 inches tall. That's a ratio of about 40%.

Edit Post

The height from the floor to the bottom of my balls is about 46,5% of my height. Is that considered long-legged?

Edit Post

Inactive post, but by having a book properly up to a wall while holding the book with an arm, I got a ratio of about 47,5 %. No wonder my legs look proportionally quite long.