Would it be easier for you to live as a tall woman instead of a short man?

Edit Post

This is sort of like a poll and I only want men to answer this question. By tall woman I mean 5'9" or 5'10" somewhere there or a little bit taller.

Personally I wouldn't do Limb Shortening if I was a tall woman. I would most likely accept my height, unless I was extremely tall... Other than that, I would make fun of shorter men if they dare judge my height. As a man, it would look stupid for a short guy making fun of tall girls because they are tall.

What do you guys think?

Edit Post

It depends on the woman's body type. A tall women who has narrow shoulders, is thin, leggy, and has other feminine features is hot as hell. It is not a disadvantage that's she's tall.

A tall woman that is 165lbs+, with a big, broad build and man hands... that's another story

Obviously the first one trumps short men. The second, not so much.

So what I'm basically saying is... body type trumps height in women, height trumps body type in men

Edit Post

but 5'9" is the perfect height for a girl, where is the problem, and 5'10" is the perfect height for modelling
6'1" and above is going to start to be awkard for a girl, maybe 6'0", but under 5'11" is okay/good
5'9" is the equivalent of 6"2 for a man, it's nowhere near very tall or gigantic, just normal tall

Edit Post

Quote from: endomorphisme on April 14, 2015, 07:53:35 PMbut 5'9" is the perfect height for a girl, where is the problem, and 5'10" is the perfect height for modelling
6'1" and above is going to start to be awkard for a girl, maybe 6'0", but under 5'11" is okay/good
5'9" is the equivalent of 6"2 for a man, it's nowhere near very tall or gigantic, just normal tall

LOL only a guy who thinks he is midget at 183 cm would think 175 cm is not a gigantic freak. 175 cm for a girl is already man height.

Edit Post

Quote from: Deepak Chopra on April 14, 2015, 08:08:13 PMLOL only a guy who thinks he is midget at 183 cm would think 175 cm is not a gigantic freak. 175 cm for a girl is already man height.

Calling a 5' 8" girl a gigantic freak is probably pushing it. Over 6' I'd say yes, she's a giantess

Edit Post

even 6'0" is not gigantic it's strong tall/very tall
maybe in india where the average height is 165 cm...for man , but in europe it's "just" very tall, for a girl

Edit Post

For me a girl all girls above 180 can be considered as tall. Every single girl besides one japanese chick was taller than 170.  Around half of them were 175+, nothing weird about that.

Edit Post

a girl of 175 is not a gigantic freak , that is stupid, 175 is a tall girl but not a very tall girl, there are lots of girls of that height

Edit Post

Quote from: Alittletooshort on April 14, 2015, 08:38:54 PMFor me a girl all girls above 180 can be considered as tall. Every single girl besides one japanese chick was taller than 170.  Around half of them were 175+, nothing weird about that.

this
some have people have never set foot in europe, they should just shut up, maybe in asia 5'9" is very tall, but in europe, it's no more than regular tall

Edit Post

being a girl of 175 is one billion times better than being a short man. the most of mans are over that height and had no problem to date a girl of that height . its even better than being a short girl.