Log in Register
Home Forums Members Calculator Research CME
MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
← Back to Off Topic

Would you rather be tall and ugly or short and handsome?

0
0184946
Member
Posts: 333
Joined: Dec 2016
Posted on Mar 26, 2017, 1:02 pm
#1
And since height is subjective short being whatever is short to you and tall being whatever is tall to you. Also post what height you thought about when you thought tall/short so I and others can know.
Like (0)
I
IwannaBeTaller
Member
Posts: 105
Joined: Jun 2014
Posted on Mar 26, 2017, 9:54 pm
#2
Tall and ugly.

Even the most extreme cosmetic surgery on your face is not as brutal as LL.

Although surgery cannot fix ugliness at all times, so after thinking about it, I would love to be middle height (like 5'10-5'11) and in exchange be a little bit more ugly than now.
Like (0)
T
TIBIKE200
Member
Posts: 361
Joined: Jan 2016
Posted on Mar 26, 2017, 10:05 pm
#3
Depends what you mean by short. If you mean my height so I prefer short and handsome as I have seen more than once that face is much more important than height
Like (0)
Y
YourSpaceBoyfriend
Member
Posts: 366
Joined: Jun 2016
Posted on Mar 26, 2017, 10:36 pm
#4
5'8 and really handsome.

You can still do LL when you are short but when you are extremely ugly then well...
Like (0)
:
:Captain America:
Member
Posts: 84
Joined: Jan 2014
Posted on Mar 26, 2017, 11:03 pm
#5
I feel like anything under 5'7-5'8 is quite a death sentence as it's nearly impossible to have a dimorphic fully-grown male body below that height. Whenever I see someone my height I cringe at how much they look like a large bobblehead on a stunted body and wish I didn't look the same.

I would much rather be ugly and tall because at least I would be taken seriously as an adult/man and have a relatively normal looking body/head ratio.
Like (0)
Y
YourSpaceBoyfriend
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: Jun 2016
Posted on Mar 26, 2017, 11:11 pm
#6
Quote from: CaptainAmerica on March 26, 2017, 11:03:06 PM
I feel like anything under 5'7-5'8 is quite a death sentence as it's nearly impossible to have a dimorphic fully-grown male body below that height.

Thanks buddy
Like (0)
B
Body Builder
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Feb 2017
Posted on Mar 26, 2017, 11:29 pm
#7
I think this is a stupid dilemma.
Being short and being ugly are both what makes a man unattractive so there is no point to think what is worse.
Both are worse enough to make dating almost impossible so it doesn't matter which is worse.

However, if you are really ugly you can't never truly fix it, even with plastic surgeries. Most of the times people who do much cosmetic surgeries in the face look completely deformed.
On the other hand, unless you are dramatically short (less than 5.3) you can become at least average with two LL's.

So, even if LL is harder than any other cosmetic surgery, it could lead in a much better outcome in looks if everything goes fine compared to cosmetic surgeries on the face which most of the times don't have good results except from a nosejob.

An ugly face can't become beautiful even with cosmetic surgeries while a short body can become average or even relatively tall.

Like (0)
I
IwannaBeTaller
Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Jun 2014
Posted on Mar 27, 2017, 12:06 am
#8
Quote from: CaptainAmerica on March 26, 2017, 11:03:06 PM
I feel like anything under 5'7-5'8 is quite a death sentence as it's nearly impossible to have a dimorphic fully-grown male body below that height. Whenever I see someone my height I cringe at how much they look like a large bobblehead on a stunted body and wish I didn't look the same.

I would much rather be ugly and tall because at least I would be taken seriously as an adult/man and have a relatively normal looking body/head ratio.

So I guess then most women on the planet have "large bobbleheads on stunted bodies", seeing as they're below that height. And even many men so to speak, since the world male average is only at 5'8''. But, hey, no hate okay. I will just say this:


SMH.
Like (0)
T
TIBIKE200
Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Jan 2016
Posted on Mar 27, 2017, 12:46 am
#9
Quote from: IwannaBeTaller on March 27, 2017, 12:06:44 AM
So I guess then most women on the planet have "large bobbleheads on stunted bodies", seeing as they're below that height. And even many men so to speak, since the world male average is only at 5'8''. But, hey, no hate okay. I will just say this:


SMH.

You can't compare women to men... Also, rather than big head on small body (Which I rarely see even on very short guys), short guys (like 165 and under) have a really small frame and it doesn't look good... Even when they train hard in the gym (It actually looks much worse being buff with a small frame.. I have seen a few at my gym)
Like (0)
I
IwannaBeTaller
Member
Posts: 105
Joined: Jun 2014
Posted on Mar 27, 2017, 1:39 pm
#10
Quote from: TIBIKE200 on March 27, 2017, 12:46:53 AM
You can't compare women to men... Also, rather than big head on small body (Which I rarely see even on very short guys), short guys (like 165 and under) have a really small frame and it doesn't look good... Even when they train hard in the gym (It actually looks much worse being buff with a small frame.. I have seen a few at my gym)

I was talking about the bobblehead argument.
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics

Jaymorgan712's "diary" was fake
Penguinn 28 replies • 2 minutes ago
Height help 23 yr or younger
shottrue 3 replies • 3 minutes ago
Why do people say that LL is the only way?
jenjen 14 replies • 3 minutes ago
Why doing LL when you can simply go to McDonald's?
Ozymandias 6 replies • 3 minutes ago
How tall does someone have to be to intimidate you?
Puertoricanwasp123 31 replies • 3 minutes ago
Statistics
  • Total Posts 130,879
  • Members 4,172
  • Online Users 21
Upcoming Webinars
Read more...
Latest Active Topics
Permanent effects of LL
5 seconds ago whysoserious
Dr Betz
1 minute ago yuppy