MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Mar 13, 2021, 8:32 pm
#11

Quote from: Body Builder on March 13, 2021, 07:54:18 PMI have a question though. Could the corrosion of steel (or any metal in orthopaedic nails, plates etc), except from poisoning which you mentioned that is not the case, increase the possibilities of a tumor in bone or other organs?
This is the most important thing for me and I would like a clear answer if you can.


Quote from: Serilium on March 13, 2021, 08:27:52 PMHow does corrosion affect health in general


I'm not him of course but I was interested by this question so I tried to find some literature on it to get an evidence-based answer. Here is a very long article summarizing the expected toxicity potentials for metal implants:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6384782/

Their table 3 summarizes different materials' expected toxicities, which vary of course depending on the metal type.

It seems though we don't actually know what metals are going into these LL devices publicly because they just describe the Stryde as "stainless steel" and yet a user had elevated chromium from it. The rep said that was normal as chromium was also part of the design. What other metals are part of the design? Who knows. Will they tell us if we ask?

I guess if people really want to know the theoretical toxicity the first step would be finding out from NuVasive exactly what elements are used, then referencing table 3 there.

In terms of cancer, they say: "Corrosion is an important factor in the design and selection of metals and alloys for service in vivo. Allergenic, toxic/cytotoxic or carcinogenic (e.g., Ni, Co, Cr, V, Al) species may be released to the body during corrosion processes." So they are saying for example chromium is potentially carcinogenic and we have already seen one case of leaching of chromium with high blood levels from Stryde.

They also say in a general sense regarding all implants: "metal ions that are released as degradation products are transported by body fluids to remote tissues where they may elicit an adverse biological reaction (such as cytotoxicity, allergy or even cancer)."

To get a real world sense of the potential impact from this, I found this study of metal-on-metal hip implants which would be expected to grind and leach their metallic elements over time:

https://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2383

They found in the first 7 years after getting these hip replacement units, there was no increased rate of cancer, but also state: "These data are reassuring, but the findings are observational with short follow-up. The use of hospital episode statistics data might underestimate cancer diagnoses, and there is the possibility of confounding by indication. Furthermore, as some cancers have a long latency period it is important that we study the longer term outcomes and continue to investigate the effects of exposure to orthopaedic metals."

If we're sure chromium is the main leaching risk then we can discuss that in more detail. Chromium exists as Chromium III or Chromium VI. Chromium III is the natural form which we all need in our diet and is nontoxic. Chromium VI is usually the form that is used in metal plating (I believe). It would be really important to clarify if they are using chromium-3 or chromium-6 if you want a clear answer. The risks of chromium-6 exposure which include cancer are detailed here:

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/chromium-compounds.pdf

In reality, whether chromium-3 or chromium-6, either way, I would guess cancer risk from one of these devices to be near zero. Potato chips are carcinogenic as well but it doesn't mean most people who have potato chips will develop cancer from them. Just because something is theoretically carcinogenic (or carcinogenic in very high levels) doesn't mean of course it will actually be carcinogenic (or carcinogenic in low levels).

If the levels are not very high or not very high for very long, then the body can usually tolerate things and have no harm done. It would be interesting and helpful perhaps if some current Stryde users could post their chromium levels as they lengthen to see how widespread/universal the issue is, how severe, and whether it lasts the full 2 years or if it's just temporary during distraction. Or ask NuVasive whether it is chromium-3 or chromium-6. Or what other elements are in the device so people know what else to have checked.

This sounds flippant but remember that even the act of living and existing is carcinogenic, as we will almost all develop cancer no matter what we do if we live long enough. We are all exposed to carcinogens every day in the smoggy air or in our food or water. It is somewhat a part of normal life and the big question is more about the severity and exact nature of the exposure, as for most of us, all carcinogens cannot be totally avoided even in normal daily life.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 13, 2021, 8:34 pm
#12

Biodur 108 (the stainless steel alloy used for Stryde) is made up of 19 to 23% chromium
https://www.fwmetals.com/materials/stainless-steel/biodur-108/

Chromium is the anti rusting property added to most or all stainless steel in the world in general I believe, don't think nuvasive is hiding anything tho 😳

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 13, 2021, 8:58 pm
#13

Quote from: Serilium on March 13, 2021, 08:34:40 PMBiodur 108 (the stainless steel alloy used for Stryde) is made up of 19 to 23% chromium
https://www.fwmetals.com/materials/stainless-steel/biodur-108/

Chromium is the anti rusting property of most or all stainless steel in the world  in general I believe, don't think nuvasive is hiding anything tho 😳


Oh great. That's very helpful. I didn't realize the alloy type was public or so easy to find. I didn't mean to imply they were hiding anything either way in a sinister sense. I just thought maybe it would be a "proprietary trade secret."

So if you want to be sure you'd need a blood test for:

Iron, Manganese, Chromium, Nickel, Copper, Molybdenum, Cobalt

Looks like the device is almost purely iron, manganese, and chromium so those would be the most important to watch if you wanted to get checked periodically through the process.

And again it would be important to clarify if it's chromium-3 or chromium-6, as chromium-3 is mostly harmless. Someone could email Fort Wayne Metals and I'm sure they'd let us know.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 13, 2021, 11:00 pm
#14

Hopefully after the biocompatibility testing, we will get our Stryde back and that Dr. A is right. If Dr. A has confidence in it's quick return then I have some hope. If not, I think I would be willing to sign a waiver for this surgery. Obviously the limitation is Nuvasive themselves now making a decision. Stryde has just changed so many people's lives, not even for CLL for just regular limb discrepancy and such. Positives heavily outweigh the negative- assuming if it's true that it leaks chromium but only at a small enough rate that is still considered only slightly elevated and not toxic.

Really want this back by summer 2022.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 14, 2021, 2:00 am
#15

thanks Dr Assayag!

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 14, 2021, 2:04 am
#16

Quote from: Serilium on March 13, 2021, 11:00:56 PMHopefully after the biocompatibility testing, we will get our Stryde back and that Dr. A is right. If Dr. A has confidence in it's quick return then I have some hope. If not, I think I would be willing to sign a waiver for this surgery. Obviously the limitation is Nuvasive themselves now making a decision. Stryde has just changed so many people's lives, not even for CLL for just regular limb discrepancy and such. Positives heavily outweigh the negative- assuming if it's true that it leaks chromium but only at a small enough rate that is still considered only slightly elevated and not toxic.

Really want this back by summer 2022.


2022 could be possible. also, sorry to bother you but your claim in your signature, do you have any proof or how did you come up with this?

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 14, 2021, 2:18 am
#17

Quote from: RealDamagedLostSoul on March 14, 2021, 02:04:12 AM2022 could be possible. also, sorry to bother you but your claim in your signature, do you have any proof or how did you come up with this?


I read it on the news. Some countries have banned this AZ vaccine due to it.
It is a small amount of people that get these side effects. But I don't see why anyone would even bother taking that risk at all. Just get the Moderna or Pfizer.

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 14, 2021, 2:33 am
#18

Quote from: Serilium on March 13, 2021, 08:27:52 PMHow does corrosion affect health in general


Thanks Dr. A - another valuable contribution to this forum. Much appreciated!

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 14, 2021, 2:42 am
#19

Quote from: Serilium on March 14, 2021, 02:18:40 AMI read it on the news. Some countries have banned this AZ vaccine due to it.
It is a small amount of people that get these side effects. But I don't see why anyone would even bother taking that risk at all. Just get the Moderna or Pfizer.


bruh it's just speculations. as of now it seems like there is no causal correlation as a control group has as many cases of thromboembolic events as the EU group of people who got that side effect after the vaccine had. I doubt it really is a side effect since there is no real evidence supporting it.

Also idk where you live but usually you cannot choose which type of vaccine you get. It's decided by your field (and age maybe).

Like (0)
Posted on Mar 14, 2021, 2:56 am
#20

It's a speculation that can potentially kill you. No harm no foul. I'm just trying to help people. Feel free to take AZ vaccine. I respect your choice. Even if it's 1% chance or 0.01% chance, I want to help people. All we know that it has more blood clots than OTHER vaccines. So if you had the choice- then pick a non AZ is my suggestion. Free world of course, so pick AZ if one decides it's fine, free will. I don't know about you but, if I was offered AZ, I would take it of course, if I wasn't doing a procedure where I break my legs and blood clotting is going to happen and is one of the major causes of death... potentially kill me. Then I would not take it. I am not anti-vaxx. I hate anti-vaxx people.

Vaccine is not decided by field or age in America in my state. It's just what's availible or offered. Moderna and Pfizer is most popular here. No choice either, but they preemptively tell you what they have.

Imagine I did not say this despite seeing the news and someone actually dies to DVT after taking this vaccine and getting LL. That would be a big regret by myself.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics