MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Feb 26, 2015, 2:19 pm
#1
Here's another proportion discussion on something I've been thinking about.

Often see pretty thin tall guys where I live and what strikes me is that they mostly seem to have very long legs. I actually think tall men are more prone to having more of their height in their legs than average or short guys. What do you think?
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 26, 2015, 3:26 pm
#2
Yes, you are correct. The  former site member GrowTallOrDieTrying posted a few research papers confirming this.
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 26, 2015, 3:30 pm
#3
Quote from: Taller on February 26, 2015, 03:26:45 PM
Yes, you are correct. The  former site member GrowTallOrDieTrying posted a few research papers confirming this.

Is there a large difference on average?

Also if you have the links to these papers please add them, I can't find anything.
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 26, 2015, 10:14 pm
#4
yeah but its minor, look at sitting height percentiles, they go up less and less every 5% extra percentile you go, but it is very small difference.
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 26, 2015, 11:19 pm
#5
Wow this is great, it means when you have longer legs as a result of LL people might just think you are born with it.

The ex-Premier of Singapore is 187 cm and it looks like his torso height is similar to the rest :http://superadrianme.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/NHLC-SM-Goh-Chok-Tong-posing-for-the-camera-with-the-HPM-Mall-Representatives.jpg
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 27, 2015, 1:45 am
#6
What is the consensus on torso-to-leg ratio anyway?

I read somewhere that ones inseam should always be less than 50% of ones height.
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 27, 2015, 2:12 am
#7
Quote from: Uppland on February 27, 2015, 01:45:12 AM

I read somewhere that ones inseam should always be less than 50% of ones height.

This was my experience. My inseam before LL was 30, and my total height was 65.3-65.5 inches, so it was less than 50%. Now, with a 32 inch inseam, it will probably be about 50%. The only thing I worry about is that I kinda have big hips, and so my pants always tend to make my legs look longer than they are (even before LL). So having to tuck in my shirt may be an issue.
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 27, 2015, 5:45 am
#8
Quote from: ItsMyLife on February 26, 2015, 11:19:56 PM
Wow this is great, it means when you have longer legs as a result of LL people might just think you are born with it.

The ex-Premier of Singapore is 187 cm and it looks like his torso height is similar to the rest :http://superadrianme.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/NHLC-SM-Goh-Chok-Tong-posing-for-the-camera-with-the-HPM-Mall-Representatives.jpg

Old people lose height on their torso, not what he wouldve looked like when he was younger. As I said, just look at sitting height percentiles and all the information you need is there, id recommend not going below a black man ratio if your white.
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 27, 2015, 11:17 am
#9
Where are the sitting height percentiles? Do tall guys usually have longer legs in relation to torso?
Like (0)
Posted on Feb 27, 2015, 12:05 pm
#10
Quote from: ItsMyLife on February 27, 2015, 11:17:53 AM
Where are the sitting height percentiles? Do tall guys usually have longer legs in relation to torso?

I was spending a relaxing evening looking up articles about human proportions and came across this:

There are also biologically and statistically significant variation between human populations in body shape. Eveleth and Tanner [45,46] published data for body proportions and leg length, estimated via the sitting height ratio, from dozens of human populations, distributed across most geographic regions of the world (Figure 9). The sitting height ratio (SHR) is a commonly used measure of body proportion. Measured stature minus sitting height may also be used to estimate leg length but this measure does not standardize for total height making it difficult to compare individuals with different statures. Mean SHR for populations of adults varies from minimum values, i.e., relatively longest legs, for Australian Aborigines (SHR = 47.3 for men and 48.1 for women) to the maximum SHR values, i.e., relatively shortest legs, for Guatemala Maya men and Peruvian women (SHR = 54.6 and 55.8 ).

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2872302/

My ratio at the moment is 53%. I am Caucasian, but I am now less concerned about my proportions knowing I'm on the upper end of the spectrum. I'll be 51% after LL.
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics

Is "proportions" a legit reasoning to undergo LL?
reitso 15 replies • 1 second ago
What do you think of 185?
Canon 27 replies • 1 second ago
opinions on my proportions?
FutureManuteBol 5 replies • 8 seconds ago
My sitting height is 95cm and height is 176cm
Luke 4 replies • 15 seconds ago
Someone make me femur mock-up please
AnotherLLer 4 replies • 20 seconds ago