174 height vs 79 inseam means 45,4 %.
So on the edge of short legs.
I always noticed that just by sitting height I am not doing bad against most men who are much taller than me.
LL would look good on me, I think, and I would have around 47% with 181 height and 85 inseam (I think 7cm is a bit on the extreme already, I am aiming for 6 cm).
So, slightly more leggy but still on the good side.
Before my Lengthening i had very short legs. Now they look much more proportionate to the torso than before. But i really think that they are still in the short range and that 4/5cm more could be ideal.
Height: 166cm
Sitting Height: Around 90-91cm
Inseam:70-71cm
Wingspan: Around 175cm
70/166 x 100= 42% so ye i always was all torso/short legs type of a guy.
I'm 64 inches in height, or around 163cm's, and my leg length from floor to crotch is 34 inches, or 86.4cm's. meaning I have a 53% leg to torso ratio. Long stride much?
Mine is 48.4% apparently. Does this mean I have a really short torso for a 5'2 person?
Yes you do, but you are a woman.
Damn... I just measured my inseam and my sitting height. Turns out I am on average side, always thought I had a long torso/short legs combo. My inseam is ~76cm and my sitting height is 87cm on the evening. I'm 167.2cm tall. So my leg to torso ratio is 0.4545. I'm now interested if my arms are long or short, can I use the same formula but with arm lenght/wingspan?
so for me it is 73cm/168.5cm x 100 = 43.32%
The bigger wingspan the better(obviously).
Just measured for you and my arms are around 74cm.
If you want some kind of image how you could look like after some amount of lengthening make mockups.
41.5%
No wonder there aren't any trousers that fitĀ 
I know how you feel man, i need to shorten my pants every damn time.
Good thing is that my mom is a tailor.
You must be logged in to post a reply.