MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 7:31 am
#11

What is wrong with your inseam? Also girls tend to have a more sh than boys due to their ass-fat. And she was probably overweight lol.

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 8:03 am
#12

My BDD meltdown has calmed down after an hour like it typically does
She was like average weight.
Inseam too long to lengthen too much, my legs measure 95.5 cm.

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 8:16 am
#13

It would be interesting to meet volunteers with 0.48 or lower sitting height ratio in person and observe their proportions and see if it looked all that bad

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 8:34 am
#14

I dont think thats your "true" inseam lol. 95.5 cm is probably your pant inseam. Ofc that's long, we all have longer inseams (pant) than the true inseam. You better measure your true inseam and tell me. Mine is like 82 cm. It's very good for lengthening, thank god.

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 8:38 am
#15

I got 82 cm as well, height say 168 cm

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 8:47 am
#16

Height-inseam= sitting height. Your SH is probably 87-86-85. Correct measurement.

You can shoot for 178cm with no problem leg/height wise. Just a bit longer legs.
82+10= 92
92÷178 = 0.516 LBR ratio

You'll be beetween +1 and +2 standart deviation.

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 8:49 am
#17

If you shoot for 180cm, you'll have a 0.5222 LBR, beetween +2 and +3 standart deviation. I think 178cm would be better.

You can find the deviation + model chart on google, just type
" The influence of ABR, LBR ratio" to google and click one of the articles.

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 10:55 am
#18

By lengthening 7-8 cm your femurs or tibias the ratio between them is drastically changed and of course the vast majority will have disproportionate legs, not only between the torso (not much for many people) but between the upper and the down half of the leg.
All these post have no meaning, if someone thinks that after a big LL will have normal proportions, he is delusional.
Maybe if you do 2 LLs of 3cm each your proportions will remain very good but noone does that a so minimal length, after all it is stupid to break a bone and give thousand of euros for 2-3cm.

That said, being tall(er) is much more important than normal proportions.
Noone ever told me or looked me weird for my very tall tibias (after 7,5cm added) and the worse think aesthetically is not the length of my feet but how long it is my tibia compared to femurs.
Another 6cm on femurs would have make my feet look much more aesthetical, although too long for my torso. Having some muscles on torso and wide back make it feel bigger so some long feet won't look weird.

Don't care that much about proportions. Height matters 100 times more.

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 3:06 pm
#19

I found this gem. I can now die in peace. https://imgur.com/a/96zi10l

Like (0)
Posted on Sep 11, 2020, 4:30 pm
#20

Yer, if you do one CLL you'll fk your bio mechanics. But if you do 2 CLL's ans everything goes well, you'll pretty much have proportioned legs lol. 5 cm tibs, 7 cm femurs looks like the best choice for the maximum gain. Not a mm more.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics