How much longer 169-170 - your suggestion

Edit Post

Hello,

I'm writing from Polish, so I apologize for my English.
I found a doctor who performs leg lengthening in my country, so I believe that the quality of the service will be high.
I have the amount ready and I want to start in the new year.

I always thought I was 172 cm tall, but it turned out that I was 169-170 cm.
I'm angry.

My hand span is 173 cm.
I read that the most attractive height is 182 cm and I would like to be like that, but I also don't want to risk my health and look like a dwarf on stilts.

I also care about proportions.
I was thinking about different combinations:
5 cm shin and 6.2 cm thigh (ratio 0.8 )
5.2 cm shin and 6.5 thigh (ratio 0.8 )
or 7 cm thigh and 5.5 cm shin.

I do not know.

The last option would make me 182 cm tall, but I'm also afraid that my arms will be too short for my legs.

I'm posting a photo - maybe it will make it easier for someone.
Please help, what do you think? What's the best thing to do?
What is your opinion? Thank you for every answer.

age: 29-30 years old

link to my photo:
https://imgur.com/a/5RuuLTF

Edit Post

I always thought my shins were too short...
I will have to take an x-ray and see the tables and compare.

Thank you for your answer.
I invite you to discuss.

Edit Post

I also thought I had short tibia, but in fact one says it's long, the other says it's short - who should I listen to? I need to do a test and check the ratio and compare it with the table.

Do you think what size would be best for lengthening the tibia and thighs?

Edit Post

Thank you for your answer. On the one hand, I want to be taller, but on the other hand, I don't want to hide my nkedness for fear that I will look like a dwarf on stilts who has to buy too long shirts for the rest of his life to cover his short torso relative to his legs.

Therefore, it is important to increase it, but neither too little nor too much at the same time so that it is safe for health.

I know it's ideal to not change anything, but being taller will increase my attractiveness from 6/10 to 7/10 on the marriage market.

Edit Post

I thought doing the tibia and thigh would make the lengthening more proportional than just doing the thigh. If I make an 8cm thigh without the tibia, this disproportion will be very visible.

Edit Post

In my country you can take a vacation for 6 months.

Will extending the tibia by 4-5 cm make me regain the ability to walk after 6 months?

6 months for everything, i.e. 3 months for extension and 3 months for recovery.

please answer. Thank you.

Edit Post

I understand, but it's better to start with the shins because they take longer to regenerate, and then move on to the thighs.

example:

I have been extending my shins by 5.2 cm for 3 months
then I rest for 3 months.

3 months later I stretch my thigh by 6.8 cm
then I rest for 3 months.

The point is that starting with the shins, while stretching the thighs, they also regenerate.

I finish the topic in 12 months with a 12 cm stretch and a return to fitness.

What do you think ?

Edit Post

I made a mock-up of myself.
on the left I am 170 cm tall.
the second photo is the femur increased by 7.5 cm.
the third photo is femur and tibia at 5.5 cm = 13 cm ( 183 cm all).

what do you think ?

https://imgur.com/a/myOWrLa

Edit Post

from 169.5 cm to 183 cm.
that must make a huge difference with women.

I'll see.
In November, I'm paying for a procedure to lengthen my shin by 6 cm (I hope the surgeon agrees because apparently it only takes 5 cm).

I'm running for politics, so I'll probably put the date in June. I will give myself such a gift for my 30th birthday .

Edit Post

Hello,

I made the final decision. I have 1 life.

tibia-6cm
femur:7.5cm
ratio: 0.8
= 13.5 cm

my height before: 169.5-170
my height after: 183 - 183.5 (6 feet)

I think I will be happy and my dating life will improve.

What do you think ?