Posted on Dec 23, 2023, 12:47 am
#31
Have you done LL?
Quote from: Leonard Shelby on December 22, 2023, 11:15:55 PMFor starters, Dr. Paley the GOAT had 2 embolism cases who almost died through internal method and he's the best in the world. Let that sink in. Now feel free to find us an embolism case through external method.
It's a common knowledge that the internal method has a higher risk of embolisms. The reason you don't see it mentioned often enough is the very reason that I made this thread. Most of the surgeons aren't very open about it but if you ask them this specifically and corner them enough, they'd have no choice but to admit it.
That's wonderful! Thanks for sharing man. Here's the type of answers that people are looking for coming to this thread.
The physical pain inside the femur does sound quite scary but unfortunately, still the only way for femoral lengthening.
It's not what I think. I'm not a surgeon but that's what the surgeons I spoke with told me. But one of the reasons might be the one that the poster above me has pointed out "Finally, having a surgeon who KNOWS how to properly attach the pins/ rods is critical if you do externals."
Yeah, been there, done that.
Quote from: Body Builder on December 22, 2023, 11:34:03 PMNobody talked.about femurs though.
And yes externals on tibias need a much more capable doctor than an internal nail. That's another reason many surgeons stick with internals.
More and easier money, thats all.
Quote from: jbfjbj4 on December 23, 2023, 09:29:03 AMSeems to me in the thread no one was distinguishing between femurs and tibias.So this isn't some subjective opinion? External tibias is the safest form of LL when looking at the science?
I agree externals on tibias is 'safer', albeit it's much more uncomfortable and inconvenient, with a fair bit more scarring. These aren't just small things to be handwaved away though - patient comfort is going to be a big predicator for adherence to stretching and good mental health during the lengthening process and so will directly affect outcomes. Given we all do this surgery to 'look better', the scars from externals are of course another issue, particularly if you live in a warm climate where you'll be wearing shorts a lot.
On the flip side, yes safety is better in terms of major complications and it is of course cheaper.
Quote from: Kintaeryos on December 23, 2023, 09:32:47 AMSo this isn't some subjective opinion? External tibias is the safest form of LL when looking at the science?
Quote from: jbfjbj4 on December 23, 2023, 09:29:03 AMSeems to me in the thread no one was distinguishing between femurs and tibias.
I agree externals on tibias is 'safer', albeit it's much more uncomfortable and inconvenient, with a fair bit more scarring. These aren't just small things to be handwaved away though - patient comfort is going to be a big predicator for adherence to stretching and good mental health during the lengthening process and so will directly affect outcomes. Given we all do this surgery to 'look better', the scars from externals are of course another issue, particularly if you live in a warm climate where you'll be wearing shorts a lot.
On the flip side, yes safety is better in terms of major complications and it is of course cheaper.
Quote from: jbfjbj4 on December 23, 2023, 09:58:28 AMWhereas the discomfort from wearing fixators is guaranteed.
You must be logged in to post a reply.