MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on May 19, 2017, 5:48 pm
#221
How much did you end up lengthening?
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 6:14 pm
#222
5 cm.
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 6:17 pm
#223
do you feel significantly taller?
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 6:25 pm
#224
no, not significantly.
Afterall it is only 2.5%.
5 cm on my penis would be a more significant.
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 6:54 pm
#225
jajjajajjjaj
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 7:13 pm
#226
so was it all worth it?
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 7:32 pm
#227
Quote from: helloworld on May 19, 2017, 02:29:42 PMAre you sure that patients post LL run slower? Dr. Monegal said I could run a little faster eventually as I have longer legs.
This is nonsense and I wonder how a doctor could say such a thing.

By lengthening only one segment mean that the biomechanics of the foot are completely out.
Even a 2 segment lengthening to keep the proportions of the foot the same would make the running slower and more unstable because the stretching of soft tissues change their abilities and they are not as capabke as before lengthening.

So I am completely sure and all patients and doctors know that noone can be as capable as before LL. If you find someone who says that he runs faster, walk for more distances, is more stable etc after LL, then he is a liar. But I've never seen anyone to say that.
Some patient reach close to 90% while others maybe less than 70% (I am not talking for extreme lengthenings or major complications).
Anything more than 80% is a very good outcome.

But be faster than before is a joke.
I wonder how Monegal said something like that.

@LL south america: if someone is completely untrained before LL and work out a lot after LL maybe he will reach the 90% of pre LL condition.
But you compare someone who doesn't train before LL with someone (even the same person) who train a lot after LL. This is a nonsense comparison because we talk about the body's capabilities before and after LL which are worse after. So if you worked out the same before and after LL, before you would have been from 10 to 30% better.
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 7:37 pm
#228
Quote from: Body Builder on May 19, 2017, 07:32:49 PMThis is nonsense and I wonder how a doctor could say such a thing.

Even larger femurs with even shorter mean that the biomechanics of the foot are comoletely out.
Even a 2 segment lengthening to keep the proportions of the foot the same would make the running slower and more unstable because the stretching of soft tissues change their abilities and they are not as capabke as before lengthening.

So I am completely sure and all patients and doctors know that noone can be as capable as before LL.
Some patient reach close to 90% while others maybe less than 70% (I am not talking for extreme lengthenings or major complications).
Anything more than 80% is a very good outcome.

But be faster than before is a joke.
I wonder how Monegal said something like that.
Maybe he wanted to say that more length more distance, the longer the limb more distance in less time, but you are right he didnt think in the damage to the tissues.
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 7:46 pm
#229
Quote from: Body Builder on May 19, 2017, 07:32:49 PMThis is nonsense and I wonder how a doctor could say such a thing.

By lengthening only one segment mean that the biomechanics of the foot are completely out.
Even a 2 segment lengthening to keep the proportions of the foot the same would make the running slower and more unstable because the stretching of soft tissues change their abilities and they are not as capabke as before lengthening.

So I am completely sure and all patients and doctors know that noone can be as capable as before LL. If you find someone who says that he runs faster, walk for more distances, is more stable etc after LL, then he is a liar. But I've never seen anyone to say that.
Some patient reach close to 90% while others maybe less than 70% (I am not talking for extreme lengthenings or major complications).
Anything more than 80% is a very good outcome.

But be faster than before is a joke.
I wonder how Monegal said something like that.

@LL south america: if someone is completely untrained before LL and work out a lot after LL maybe he will reach the 90% of pre LL condition.
But you compare someone who doesn't train before LL with someone (even the same person) who train a lot after LL. This is a nonsense comparison because we talk about the body's capabilities before and after LL which are worse after. So if you worked out the same before and after LL, before you would have been from 10 to 30% better.
He said it would take time, but lengthening should not have any negative impact. I think the faster was said jokingly.
Like (0)
Posted on May 19, 2017, 7:50 pm
#230
Quote from: onemorefoot on May 19, 2017, 07:37:34 PMMaybe he wanted to say that more length more distance, the longer the limb more distance in less time, but you are right he didnt think in the damage to the tissues.
This is a very simplistic approach. If it was right then runners would break their bones to have longer limbs to be even faster

But this is completely wrong.
Tha change in biomechanics and the soft tissue damage are more than enough to never be like before.
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics