people with bad genes should not have kids

Edit Post

i think people with bad genes should not have kids and let an other human being suffer the same kind of pain they go through,any thoughts?

Edit Post

Quote from: yash on November 25, 2021, 03:21:34 AMi think people with bad genes should not have kids and let an other human being suffer the same kind of pain they go through,any thoughts?

Define bad genetics?

Edit Post

Incel topic. This is a forum for people interested in limb lengthening. Get a therapist.

Edit Post

If we're talking about extremely bad autosomal dominant genes that would cause chronic pain / complications (and there's no way to select against it pre-fertilization) then I would say adoption is a good choice. Wouldn't deny someone the ubiquitous once-in-a-lifetime experience of raising a kid. That said, procreation is literally the meaning of life

Edit Post

I agree.  Eugenics is fantastic; it would solve so many problems.  Too bad it got conflated with racism, so good luck getting people to accept it now.

Edit Post

Dude chill out. Bad genetics are just guaranteing higher possibiltiie of bad characters and it is very absurd to ignore the haphazard.

Edit Post

Quote from: yash on November 25, 2021, 03:21:34 AMi think people with bad genes should not have kids and let an other human being suffer the same kind of pain they go through,any thoughts?

Like nazys, cattle or dogs race selection?

Edit Post

Quote from: daddy longlegs on November 25, 2021, 04:30:41 AMIf we're talking about extremely bad autosomal dominant genes that would cause chronic pain / complications (and there's no way to select against it pre-fertilization) then I would say adoption is a good choice. Wouldn't deny someone the ubiquitous once-in-a-lifetime experience of raising a kid. That said, procreation is literally the meaning of life
Life itself is meaningless and the meanings can vary from this person to another. Reproducing is not the meaning of everyone's life and it's kinda like a philosophic conundrum.

Edit Post

Quote from: desensitize on November 25, 2021, 10:46:39 AMLife itself is meaningless and the meanings can vary from this person to another. Reproducing is not the meaning of everyone's life and it's kinda like a philosophic conundrum.
I agree with you mate..

Edit Post

Quote from: daddy longlegs on November 25, 2021, 04:30:41 AMIf we're talking about extremely bad autosomal dominant genes that would cause chronic pain / complications (and there's no way to select against it pre-fertilization) then I would say adoption is a good choice. Wouldn't deny someone the ubiquitous once-in-a-lifetime experience of raising a kid. That said, procreation is literally the meaning of life
It will soon be possible to eliminate or "correcting"  gene mutations causing severe diseases, handicaps and suffering,  either pre or immediatly post fertilisation with technologies such as CRISPR.

Altough this may also open the way to eugenics, which may be dangerous because soon will be people wanting to make rankings of "quality" of human beings for example for reasons of insurance and recruitment and even nazy type discrimination (pseudo validated by science), this is ANOTHER reason to avoid that absurd, racist idea of selecting and preventing anybody from having sons.