MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Oct 18, 2014, 11:49 pm
#11

Quote from: Taller on October 18, 2014, 08:49:24 PM680, you do realize that women won't know anything about your dck until after they've been atteacted to you by other qualities, ie your height.


Like i said, Its a quote. I wanted to point out that other people don't think that height is number one priority in men. If you're average height or a bit below it won't matter THAT much, I mean it won't be the turn off factor for most girls, And for those who won't give you a chance solely because of your insufficient height, You're dodging a bullet as far as i am concerned.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 19, 2014, 3:14 pm
#12

Quote from: 680 on October 18, 2014, 06:09:44 PMthe law of equivalent exchange.


Homie got dat dck size

- Growtallerordietrying1 would make Machiavelli proud, he's a true cynic.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 19, 2014, 7:02 pm
#13

self-interest and honorable character are neither mutually exclusive.

 or necessarily characterized as having different weights for importance. the law of equivalent exchange.

however:
acting with honor in regards to natural selection is an invalid option. as no such thing exists. therefore as only decisions based on measures can be made, I cant be a cynic. in short choosing a mate is rather an apathetic subconscious drive which negates the emotion of honor. you can neither use or not use honor in regards to natural selection.

I am sure you don't wake up in the morning and say to yourself today I am going to go find me an ugly bitch to marry today and spend the rest of my life with her and her ugliness because it would be honorable. choosing a mate has nothing to do with morals.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 19, 2014, 8:31 pm
#14

Quote from: 123 on October 18, 2014, 05:11:13 PMEveryone who brags about his IQ is not smart at all.

well I do brag my-self for my IQ in this cumircumstance cause I just wanna say this is the only possitive thing that I got from my gene pull...i wouldn't refer to it otherwise, sorry for the confusion.( though irmt hasn't been proven that intelligence has a genetic factor)

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 19, 2014, 10:50 pm
#15

Quote from: GROWtalORdieTRYING1 on October 19, 2014, 07:02:52 PMself-interest and honorable character are neither mutually exclusive.

 or necessarily characterized as having different weights for importance. the law of equivalent exchange.

however:
acting with honor in regards to natural selection is an invalid option. as no such thing exists. therefore as only decisions based on measures can be made, I cant be a cynic. in short choosing a mate is rather an apathetic subconscious drive which negates the emotion of honor. you can neither use or not use honor in regards to natural selection.

I am sure you don't wake up in the morning and say to yourself today I am going to go find me an ugly bitch to marry today and spend the rest of my life with her and her ugliness because it would be honorable. choosing a mate has nothing to do with morals.


My mistake you're a realist or maybe you should read some Sheakspeare instead of Richard Dawkins.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 20, 2014, 4:42 am
#16

1. There is the Pessimist who believes the glass is half empty!

2. There is the Optimist who believes the glass is half full!

3. Then there is the Realist who knows it is just half a fking glass!

the law of equivalent exchange.

Quotedictionary: Realist:
 Realists have a firm grip on reality and can see things for what they are, not what they are told they are. Realists have their own views and do not fall victim to propaganda, misconception, or titles!


I don't mind if you call me a realist the law of equivalent exchange.

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 4, 2014, 2:52 am
#17

Quote from: 680 on October 18, 2014, 06:28:59 PMIt's really hard to find ugly people in today's world, Not so many ugly young people rofl. Perception of beauty is very different for different people, I remember sitting next to one ugly mofo at my drivers ed, His face was ultra ssmashed  the law of equivalent exchange. , But he was as tall as the door frame, Not as wide as me and he had maybe 2-3 inches max more arm lenght and  sitting height no more than 2-3 inches over me, But HIS face was so awful, There are so many factors that you have to take before height, Unless you're way under the average.

To quote some random guy

" Woman care about your face, your dck and your wallet before they even notice your height. "


No I don't agree. I think there's a certain standard set for beauty. If a woman walked into a room and she was 5'7", thin framed, perfect face and breasts, all guys would consider her beautiful. Some might say ther like Asian or Mexican women more but they'd still admire her beauty.

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 4, 2014, 4:42 am
#18

Quote from: Disobedient on October 18, 2014, 06:29:46 PM3 hours Iq test?? never heard about it before it's either 20,30,45,or 60min
how many question in this 3 hours Iq test???

Maybe it took him 3 hrs to finish the test...

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 4, 2014, 6:13 am
#19

Quote from: Bruno Mars on November 04, 2014, 04:42:18 AMMaybe it took him 3 hrs to finish the test...

nope talking about the Mensa one

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 26, 2014, 6:36 pm
#20

Quote from: GROWtalORdieTRYING1 on October 18, 2014, 01:18:21 AMwhy do some men who are planning to get leg lengthening surgery make this mistake.


ok, we live in a world of equivalent exchange.

kings marry queens,
nobels marry nobels,
fatties marry fatties,
ugly date ugly the law of equivalent exchange.

we all know the nerds and geeks don't date the prom queen.
and the female peack only gets with the male who has the brightest best feathers.

its a simple game. females select the best genetic male to produce the best offspring. just as a female peack selects a male peack with the best genes.

so my question is simple. since we humans are programed into this "law of equivalent exchange" where girls try to select the best possible mate based on the best possible genes for the best possible offspring...................

why do men get so f**king pissed off and act as if the girl has no morals when a girl rejects them for having inferior genes. and tries to go for a male with a better genetic profile.

let me reiterate. if the prom queen tells the nerd NO IM NOT GOING TO DATE THE NERD. we accept that because she can do better, but when a woman tells a man she wants a taller guy because she thinks she can do better "all of a sudden it is because she has no morals".

this makes no sense. she is just doing what she is biologically programed to do, she is selecting the best genes for the best offspring. it has nothing to do with morals.

its like a nerd getting pissed off because he cant date the prom queen. in essence it is a person getting pissed off because they cant have what they want. its the law of equivalent exchange.

thoughts?  yes I was bored so I decided to open this discussion and see what happens the law of equivalent exchange.


Women are not programmed to seek taller males. There is no evidence to suggest that evolution has programmed that into them. After all, there is little to no natural selection advantage to being tall.

Therefore, discrimination against short men is blatant discrimination.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics