Ive known of a formula:Your height=(Fathers height+Mothers height)/2士7.5cm
I dunno if thats the most reasonable one although I think it is.
Quote from: Body Builder on November 30, 2020, 02:40:08 PMNone.
With the above formula I should have been 1,73 but I was 1.685 prell.
Definitely there isn't any formula to predict height.
Actually I just wanna assure if I screwed up my genes.
I was below 140cm tall when I was 12 y.o and now I'm 162-163cm tall now(20 y.o).
Quote from: YungGud on November 30, 2020, 03:49:39 PMBy this formula I suppose to be 165 cm, but I'm 178
By this formula I suppose to be 160cm and Im 162cm
Quote from: Body Builder on December 01, 2020, 10:40:20 PM4 inches of height are way too much for a formula to be considered accurate for height.
It is common sense that a 5.5 man and a 5.3 woman won't make an 6.4 ft son most of the times.
A working formula should be accurate at least 1 inch more or less not 4 inches!
Because height ain't decided by just one factor(Although gene is the most important factor) and even speaking of genes alone offsprings may realize mutations.That is to say if you are in the twenty-distance range of the result your height is generally reasonable.
Quote from: NotSoBigBadBruin on December 02, 2020, 12:10:02 PMYou’re right, but according to the aforementioned formula, there’s only a 5 percent change of ending up > 2 inches shorter/taller than your predicted height.
So if your predicted height is 5’5, there is a 95 percent chance that your actual height will be between 5’3 and 5’7.
If you got that right my predicted height is only f||king 160cm and I'm 162cm tall.
Quote from: NotSoBigBadBruin on December 02, 2020, 01:07:50 PMYour point being? According to the formula, if your predicted height is 160 cm, there is a 95 percent chance that your actual height will be between 155 and 165 cm.
Then my point is to highly admire this mysterious formula cuz it precisely predicted my inherited height.
You must be logged in to post a reply.