Quote from: Bruce Wayne on November 21, 2020, 03:56:22 AMBut there is also pure sxxual relationship where the female sxxually objectifies the male too, which is what we all should be going for anyway.
Sure, when you're Chad incarnate. But if you are less than the top 10 percentile in smv with respects to her social circle, good luck hoping to get sxxually objectified by women. And btw even if you're Chad incarnate don't expect to be loved by a woman for your personhood since the whole crux of the matter is women wanting to replicate Chad's genes not finally seeing what a "good" person he is and why she should stay with him through thick and thin, which is ultimately a product of evolution.
Dare I say only a man has the capacity to love someone for their personhood since the way they perceive the world is static, cause otherwise how could you've build things? Create great civilizations? Women on the other hand can't because of their subjective reality that's ever changing, when a woman says she loves you she really does mean that but 5 months down the line when she falls out of love that's also a fact for her whether you care to accept it or not.
Their inherent solipsism and subjective reality precludes the possibility of them ever loving someone for their personhood, which is hypothesized as a result of of being subjected to traumatic events namely your male partner being taken away from you by other warring tribes and then begrudgingly joining them lead ultimately to them lacking loyalty the way a man has, which is also a product of evolution.
In the end Chad fuĉks beta bucks in a nutshell.
Quote from: NotSoBigBadBruin on November 21, 2020, 11:11:27 AMI’m glad my wife was making much more money than me when we met, because I guess this means she wasn’t only after my money.
Is that the case even now? How about 10 years later into the relationship? I mean if you're married and she's making making more than you than you're going to be divorced soon pal based on the statistics and probability I'm afraid.
Quote from: NotSoBigBadBruin on November 21, 2020, 11:11:27 AMBut seriously, you really need to put down those philosophy books and start dating. Some guys here on this forum pretend to know all about women and relationships although it sounds like they have no experience with women at all or have only been in very toxic relationships.
We got more than enough men expressing these facts as anecdotal evidence and empirical evidence regarding dating from dating sites/apps and also traditional psychological simulations of dating which also corresponds to evolutionary biology/psychology and anthropology across the millennium concerning human beings.
So no need to go on dismissing entire fields of sciences in pursuit of maintaining your feel good delusions when 100 years of data is available at the click of your finger tips, that's if you have the intellectual integrity to explore the facts yourself.
Quote from: ZUCC420 on November 21, 2020, 03:24:01 PMSure, when you're Chad incarnate. But if you are less than the top 10 percentile in smv with respects to her social circle, good luck hoping to get sxxually objectified by women. And btw even if you're Chad incarnate don't expect to be loved by a woman for your personhood since the whole crux of the matter is women wanting to replicate Chad's genes not finally seeing what a "good" person he is and why she should stay with him through thick and thin, which is ultimately a product of evolution.
Dare I say only a man has the capacity to love someone for their personhood since the way they perceive the world is static, cause otherwise how could you've build things? Create great civilizations? Women on the other hand can't because of their subjective reality that's ever changing, when a woman says she loves you she really does mean that but 5 months down the line when she falls out of love that's also a fact for her whether you care to accept it or not.
Their inherent solipsism and subjective reality precludes the possibility of them ever loving someone for their personhood, which is hypothesized as a result of of being subjected to traumatic events namely your male partner being taken away from you by other warring tribes and then begrudgingly joining them lead ultimately to them lacking loyalty the way a man has, which is also a product of evolution.
In the end Chad fuĉks beta bucks in a nutshell.
Is that the case even now? How about 10 years later into the relationship? I mean if you're married and she's making making more than you than you're going to be divorced soon pal based on the statistics and probability I'm afraid.
We got more than enough men expressing these facts as anecdotal evidence and empirical evidence regarding dating from dating sites/apps and also traditional psychological simulations of dating which also corresponds to evolutionary biology/psychology and anthropology across the millennium concerning human beings.
So no need to go on dismissing entire fields of sciences in pursuit of maintaining your feel good delusions when 100 years of data is available at the click of your finger tips, that's if you have the intellectual integrity to explore the facts yourself.
I’m the one making more these days, but that’s something she couldn’t have known back then. I must be a real Chad, then.
So you base all your decisions on probabilities and empirical data?
“Do you wanna get married?”
“Nah, there’s a 50 percent chance it’s going to end in a divorce.”
“We’re having a party down at the beach. Do you wanna come?”
“Nah, there’s a 60 percent chance of rain. I’m gonna stay home and read a book about how happiness is just an illusion.”
“Do you wanna go on a date with me?”
“Nah, I’m good. There’s only a 10 percent chance of us having sxx and/or becoming a couple.”
Sounds like a recipe for a very exciting life ...
Quote from: ZUCC420 on November 21, 2020, 03:24:01 PMAnd btw even if you're Chad incarnate don't expect to be loved by a woman for your personhood since the whole crux of the matter is women wanting to replicate Chad's genes not finally seeing what a "good" person he is and why she should stay with him through thick and thin, which is ultimately a product of evolution.
No no, I'm not talking about love. Sexual relationship is what its name indicates, it's all physical, doesn't have anything to do with personality, good or bad person is irrelevant. It's also not necessary for her to stay.
Quote from: NotSoBigBadBruin on November 21, 2020, 05:03:54 PMI’m the one making more these days, but that’s something she couldn’t have known back then. I must be a real Chad, then.
Which further proves my whole point, and no you aren't a Chad just a betabucks.
Quote from: NotSoBigBadBruin on November 21, 2020, 05:03:54 PM
So you base all your decisions on probabilities and empirical data?
“Do you wanna get married?”
“Nah, there’s a 50 percent chance it’s going to end in a divorce.”
“We’re having a party down at the beach. Do you wanna come?”
“Nah, there’s a 60 percent chance of rain. I’m gonna stay home and read a book about how happiness is just an illusion.”
“Do you wanna go on a date with me?”
“Nah, I’m good. There’s only a 10 percent chance of us having sxx and/or becoming a couple.”
Sounds like a recipe for a very exciting life ...
I prefer cold hard data versus feel goodism where you go in blindly in a minefield expecting to find a unicorn. Also the rest of the rhetoric doesn't address my arguments at all. I hope you realize that you're telling others to seek delusions like yourself instead of anything resembling reality.
Quote from: Bruce Wayne on November 21, 2020, 05:07:16 PMNo no, I'm not talking about love. sxxual relationship is what its name indicates, it's all physical, doesn't have anything to do with personality, good or bad person is irrelevant. It's also not necessary for her to stay.
Yap that's how a rational being should act like but inevitably you'll fall in love and that's when she'll ditch your ass when you have invested 100% into the relationship which is aptly referred to as the betaization process.
https://www.reddit.com/r/marriedredpill/comments/4hpmg2/theory_the_betaization_process_stages_of_female/
If your key to happiness is to stay single your entire life and not take any risks whatsoever, chances are you’re going to miss out on many of the best things in life. But if that’s how you want to live your life, that’s perfectly fine. 👍🏻
(Just as a side note, there are also studies showing that people who enjoy taking risks are more content and satisfied with their lives.)
Quote from: NotSoBigBadBruin on November 21, 2020, 05:37:02 PMIf your key to happiness is to stay single your entire life and not take any risks whatsoever, chances are you’re going to miss out on many of the best things in life. But if that’s how you want to live your life, that’s perfectly fine.
(Just as a side note, there are also studies showing that people who enjoy taking risks are more content and satisfied with their lives.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8byGFryWQRU
Seems like you've ran out of gas hence didn't even bother to respond to any of my arguments, that's a smart move btw you should further keep on making such decisions in your life since it'll probably serve you much better than the current dominant model of "exciting" braindead delusional risk taking that's devoid of neurons being rubbed inside your head.
Also no need to defend and justify your own stupid marriage to us folks at leg lengthening sites, it seems to have served you so well that you've ended up right here with us, saving money in hopes to get your legs broken and lengthened, perhaps in order to save your own marriage?
You're no better than us who hadn't been married or been in a relationship likewise if you had to resort to such a fringe forum where people pay thousands of dollars to get their legs broken whilst staying infirm for months being confined to a hospital cot, counting their days.
Believe it or not, but I have better things to do than read up on black pill theories developed by sxxually frustrated men. And I simply don’t care if you choose not to get laid and live a life in solitude. So why should I spend more time arguing with you?
The only reason I commented was that you were trying to provide insights into women and relationships when you clearly have little to no experience with relationships.
I could easily afford Paley’s 16 cm LL program and become a 196 cm Slander Man if I wanted to, but thanks for worrying about my finances.
And you can talk BS about my marriage and try to insult me all you want, it’s just making me feel sorry for you. My marriage is perfect, and I’m eternally grateful for having such an amazing woman in my life who loves me unconditionally. No keyboard warrior in the world is going to convince me otherwise. I’m also grateful for being able to lead a perfectly happy life despite my height dysphoria. I’m only considering this surgery to satisfy my own vanity and because I’d have ended up taller if I hadn’t suffered from hypogonadism in my late teens.
I know I’m not better than anyone here on this forum, and I’d never insult anyone the way you’re trying to insult me. By the way, smart people don’t have to include the result of some BS personality test in their signature and use a painting of Schopenhauer as their profile pic just to make sure everyone knows how smart they are.
So again, if you want to live a life in solitude, that’s totally fine. But don’t try to drag everyone on this forum down with your “life’s not worth living if you’re short, all relationships are doomed to fail anyway, etc.” BS.
Quote from: NotSoBigBadBruin on November 21, 2020, 07:32:08 PMBelieve it or not, but I have better things to do than read up on black pill theories developed by sxxually frustrated men. And I simply don’t care if you choose not to get laid and live a life in solitude. So why should I spend more time arguing with you?
The only reason I commented was that you were trying to provide insights into women and relationships when you clearly have little to no experience with relationships.
I could easily afford Paley’s 16 cm LL program and become a 196 cm Slander Man if I wanted to, but thanks for worrying about my finances.
And you can talk BS about my marriage and try to insult me all you want, it’s just making me feel sorry for you. My marriage is perfect, and I’m eternally grateful for having such an amazing woman in my life who loves me unconditionally. No keyboard warrior in the world is going to convince me otherwise. I’m also grateful for being able to lead a perfectly happy life despite my height dysphoria. I’m only considering this surgery to satisfy my own vanity and because I’d have ended up taller if I hadn’t suffered from hypogonadism in my late teens.
I know I’m not better than anyone here on this forum, and I’d never insult anyone the way you’re trying to insult me. By the way, smart people don’t have to include the result of some BS personality test in their signature and use a painting of Schopenhauer as their profile pic just to make sure everyone knows how smart they are.
So again, if you want to live a life in solitude, that’s totally fine. But don’t try to drag everyone on this forum down with your “life’s not worth living if you’re short, all relationships are doomed to fail anyway, etc.” BS.
Quite an emotional outburst you've proudly put on display here I must say, it's a rather predictable spectacle when it comes to discourse with your ilk. Thanks for finally showing your true colors, I won't bother further commenting anything else since I don't have anything to add to the conversation and besides people here can judge it themselves.
I completely agree with NotSoBigBadBruin. Everyone here needs to chill down. Most of the members are here to look up info about doctors and check out our cll vets’ diaries, not to argue about these kind of bs. And dude (@Zucc420), don’t try to diminish other relationships just because of your personal experience. I’m 120% sure my girlfriend is not with me for any of the reasons you or @Batman mentioned.
Quote from: Skyisthelimit on November 21, 2020, 08:24:35 PMI’m 120% sure my girlfriend is not with me for any of the reasons you or @Batman mentioned.
Okay, though it's not like you could actually be capable of deciding that matter in a dispassionate lense and have an interpretation be anything other than the current one you hold ....... so.
Or for that matter be able to internalize such knowledge without having a mental breakdown, cognitive dissonance and finally compartmentalizing facts or completely dismissing it based on "muh incel" "you incel wah".
I mean really which man would really be capable of holding the fact that his girlfriend or wife is only with him because of his money whilst being in a "loving" relationship? Makes sense based on evidence but does it really makes sense to the mind that's currently in a relationship?
They would rather kill themselves first rather than accept reality which is evident after a divorce when you take a look at the data. So Didn't think so.
You must be logged in to post a reply.