MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 12:14 am
#1
I basically asked a question to a LL veteren who had the surgery in 2007 about if his legs we're back to 100% or not and if he felt like his legs felt like they were older than the rest of his body.

My question:

Well, you did the LL surgery in 2007 and its 2020 now, so after those long 13 years do you feel like your legs are in good health for your current age or do you have the feeling that your legs are like 10+ years older then the rest of your body?


The answer I got from member 'Medium Drink Of Water':

No, I don't feel like they're as healthy as the rest of my body:

They're stiff and I feel like I've reached maximum flexibility with them.
They get tired easier than I think they should/would without LL.
The skin looks a little bit splotchy and veiny, especially over the tibialis anterior muscles, and is injured more easily and takes longer to heal.  I bumped my shin two years ago (spring 2018) and broke the skin, and I can still see the mark.  If that had been on my arm, no way would it show right now.

My conclusion:

You'll legs will never be 100% after the surgery and they will feel older than the rest of your body. If you still think about having the LL surgery I wish you all the luck in the world and hopefully you'll make a quick and healthy recovery!
Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 7:31 am
#2
Based on that info about one person, you cannot draw a general conclusion.

Medium Drink Of Water did 3 inches on Tibia. That's far more than recommended nowadays.
Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 12:12 pm
#3
Quote from: mangoman on June 02, 2020, 07:31:00 AMBased on that info about one person, you cannot draw a general conclusion.

Medium Drink Of Water did 3 inches on Tibia. That's far more than recommended nowadays.

I'll get more examples of other LL patients just to proof to delusional people that its not a smart choice if you want strong healthy legs and be able to walk normal at 60+...

I obviously understand that some people are simply to delusional to even try to understand my point but even if I can save 1 fellow forum member from that hell like future I'll gladly do my best, by the way if you understand the repurcussions and you're still willing to undergo the procedure even though you understand that you'll legs will never be the same again I'll support you!
Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 12:46 pm
#4
Some questions one should leave to the researchers that have the necessary knowledge and statistical skills. Collecting examples doesn't say anything without proper analysis. So before continuing your honorable mission, please get a PhD in medicine, get the necessary data and get your work reviewed by other academics. Everything else is pointless.

Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 2:14 pm
#5
Hard to say how much you can generalize from my case.  I lengthened a lot, but I started out with very flexible lower legs anyway.  I did gymnastics as a kid, and whenever we'd stretch our calves I'd barely feel anything and wonder if I was even doing the stretch right.
Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 3:06 pm
#6
Most surgeons don't directly answer this question. They normally say:

"there is no evidence to suggest any long term problems"
"LL has existed from decades for discrepancy and there are patients from that era who are ok even today"
"I have treated x cases and all are said they are happy"

CLL deserves its own study of several hundred patients where they are measured objectively after they finish the procedure for various tests like agility, strength, flexibility, etc. This has unfortunately not been done.
Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 6:05 pm
#7
Don't forget LL has made big strides in 13 years You will never be 100% after the surgery, here is some proof.
Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 6:43 pm
#8
Quote from: Montreal172 on June 02, 2020, 06:05:25 PMDon't forget LL has made big strides in 13 years You will never be 100% after the surgery, here is some proof.

"technology has improved a lot in the last 13 years. we are seeing some GREAT outcomes with this new technology. patients are going back to normal life in 2 weeks"
Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 7:13 pm
#9
Quote from: frenchie on June 02, 2020, 06:43:09 PM"technology has improved a lot in the last 13 years. we are seeing some GREAT outcomes with this new technology. patients are going back to normal life in 2 weeks"

This has nothing to do with long-term health though.  All the new technology did was improve mobility and comfort during distraction.
Like (0)
Posted on Jun 2, 2020, 8:26 pm
#10
Quote from: frenchie on June 02, 2020, 06:43:09 PM"technology has improved a lot in the last 13 years. we are seeing some GREAT outcomes with this new technology. patients are going back to normal life in 2 weeks"
[/quote}
not a single stryde patient has gone "back to normal life in 2 weeks" lol ... that's almost impossible at 2 weeks we're not even done recovering from surgery trauma. Don't spread false info, inform yourself first.

and @ V... your statement may or may not be true, after all what is 100%? 100% is getting in the same physical shape as you were pre op? doing the same things you were able to do pre op with the same strength and ease? ... if so there's people here who've claimed to have surpassed their pre op abilities and strength with hard work in the gym and dedication.
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics