MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Aug 8, 2020, 7:18 am
#1
I'm primarily concerned with my leg to body ratio as I already have proportionally longer legs.
I don't mind having long legs, but if they're abnormally long that's a problem.

The first two are what I usually wear in public. Notice there are 2-4 inches of overlap between my shirt and pants.
The third is me trying to wear the same thing as the Paley orange shirt guy (but with a slightly different orange shirt).
The last is me wearing a suit and tucked shirt. This is important because this is what I would look like at an interview, wedding, other formal event etc.

Where should I stop, 5cm, 6.5cm, or 8cm?
I know it's a lot of mockups, but if you want you can just look at the last ones, the suit and Paley orange shirt.

And yes, the dog in the background is the real Hobbes the Dog that I named this account after.


What I usually wear (long pants):

5cm: https://imgur.com/a/horYGDu
6.5cm: https://imgur.com/a/NJPoieQ
8cm: https://imgur.com/a/32yWpk5

What I usually wear (shorts):
5cm: https://imgur.com/a/eLANwAY
6.5cm: https://imgur.com/a/yrISJfP
8cm: https://imgur.com/a/WTuLGAv

An imitation of the Paley orange shirt guy:
5cm: https://imgur.com/a/GBHPo67
6.5cm: https://imgur.com/a/wATl2oo
8cm: https://imgur.com/a/GKIXamw

Wearing a suit and tucked shirt (I'd like you to pay extra attention to this one):
5cm: https://imgur.com/a/SrMYXhI
6.5cm: https://imgur.com/a/47C7yLe
8cm: https://imgur.com/a/wwNUa4W
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 8, 2020, 7:55 am
#2
Take the pictures from eye level, I used to do a similar mistake and it makes your legs look longer than they actually appear. As for the pictures, 5-8 doesn't look much different, not abnormal but not good and arms look short except in the shorts pictures which do look good.
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 8, 2020, 3:49 pm
#3
Keep in mind if you lengthen 8cm you ain’t going to get the full 8cm because of angle of bone. Ie 10% slant will mean you only grow 7.2cm
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 8, 2020, 10:42 pm
#4
Will there ever be a situation where as a male it wouldn't be socially acceptable to not wear a tucked-in shirt with nothing covering it? For example, for the suit pic I intentionally didn't fasten the bottom button, but if I got 8cm I probably would. I usually don't tuck my shirt in so I'm sure 8cm would look fine most of the time, but what about semi-formal events that don't warrant a suit but usually a dress shirt that would be tucked in? Then it might be obvious



Like (0)
Posted on Aug 8, 2020, 11:03 pm
#5
Lol? Seriously don't even waste your time thinking about it lmao. I have a friend who is exactly 180cm which isn't even a tall height, I just checked his WhatsApp profile picture where he was wearing a white shirt tucked in. His legs are looking so hot, his torso looks short but it's definetely not a problem. He looks very well aesthetically. You don't need to worry about that, fervently.

Quote from: HobbesTheDog on August 08, 2020, 10:42:08 PMWill there ever be a situation where as a male it wouldn't be socially acceptable to not wear a tucked-in shirt with nothing covering it? For example, for the suit pic I intentionally didn't fasten the bottom button, but if I got 8cm I probably would. I usually don't tuck my shirt in so I'm sure 8cm would look fine most of the time, but what about semi-formal events that don't warrant a suit but usually a dress shirt that would be tucked in? Then it might be obvious




Like (0)
Posted on Aug 8, 2020, 11:08 pm
#6
Also, are you Asian? Because your arms are really short. I'm not so much taller than you but my arms can easily pull off 180cm (which makes me grateful at least), I can tryhard on 185 with sligtly short arms, I guess i'm lucky. But I'm not lucky at sitting height though, Ik it doesn't really matter but still. Only 90 cms..
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 8, 2020, 11:42 pm
#7
I am, but I think my arms only look short because my legs are long.
I just measured my wingspan and it is 166 cm.
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 9, 2020, 5:10 am
#8
bro you are trippin    8cm vs 6.5cm vs 5cm femurs
the photos look great, with the longer legs it gives you model proportions
you only need to worry about arm length in relation to your torso ( those are paleys words not mine)
as long as you can fit your hand in your pockets youll be fine
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 9, 2020, 5:51 am
#9
Quote from: A on August 08, 2020, 11:03:14 PMLol? Seriously don't even waste your time thinking about it lmao. I have a friend who is exactly 180cm which isn't even a tall height, I just checked his WhatsApp profile picture where he was wearing a white shirt tucked in. His legs are looking so hot, his torso looks short but it's definetely not a problem. He looks very well aesthetically. You don't need to worry about that, fervently.

I hope you understand why I am taking proportions very seriously. It's a permanent body modification.

Quote from: Scarface on August 08, 2020, 07:55:03 AMTake the pictures from eye level, I used to do a similar mistake and it makes your legs look longer than they actually appear. As for the pictures, 5-8 doesn't look much different, not abnormal but not good and arms look short except in the shorts pictures which do look good.

Here are suit mockups for 6.5cm and 8cm at eye level.
6.5cm: https://imgur.com/a/9go38Io
8cm: https://imgur.com/a/4hhXy0Z

What do you think?
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 9, 2020, 6:44 am
#10
Doesn't look like eye level to me. Middle of picture should be your head
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics