Below are X-rays of my tibias at different stages post implantation of the PRECICE 2.2. As you can see in the first image (zoom in if you need to), the bone break is far from a clean cut - there's a triangular bone chip. Definitely not what I expected to see.
When I asked Dr. Robbins (Paley's colleague) about this in April, he said it's actually a new bone breaking technique, designed to increase the bone surface around the break, for increased bone generation. However, this is at odds with Paley describing how to avoid butterfly in his January talk ("I guarantee that there's no butterfly").
Thoughts?

Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on May 14, 2018, 9:35 am
#1
Posted on Jun 18, 2018, 7:53 am
#2
Quote from: LLprime2 on May 14, 2018, 10:24:45 PMI always wonder how the bones that are not aligned will grow together. Will it look like this?
Not quite.
Since the bone segments get farther and farther from each other, the ensuing gap becomes more and more "vertical" (in the typical x-ray orientation). Here's how that gap looked on June 8 (7 weeks of lengthening the tibias, 4 weeks since stopping lengthening):
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Stryde nail results after 6 months: Are 6cm gains typical with newer femur lengthening techniques
amy_m
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Minimizing leg lengthening scars with silicone tapes and massage therapy effective
HeightHope
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Limb lengthening on Reddit: What are users' most surprising successes and failures?
amelia1997
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
How can limb lengthening at 13 impact overall bone health and growth plates long term
chris_b94
7 replies • 4 weeks ago
Limb lengthening at London Surgery Bedford: What's the average cost for a 5cm gain
jason_kim
7 replies • 4 weeks ago
Tibia lengthening before and after photos what to expect during recovery
gabriel94
7 replies • 1 month ago