Posted on Jul 13, 2021, 9:36 pm
#1
I have mostly been lurking around here on and off. Now I'm seriously considering lenghtning with the LON-method next summer, or possibly Stryde if/when it comes back and I have managed to save up the extra funds.
I had always thought my Tibias were proportionally very short compared to my femurs. But judging from the attached images that may just be an illusion because my calves and legs overall are very thick and stumpy.
http://imgur.com/a/JQCR7PV
Pics are NSFW I guess (in my boxers xD)
I'm 168-170cm
169cm wingspan
What do you guys think? Femurs or tibias? Personally I think a ~5.5cm on tibias would look the most aesthetically pleasing and well proportioned biomechanically. I don't really plan to lenghten over 6cm due to my short arms... sorry no xrays to measure exact lenght of femur and tibias yet...
I had always thought my Tibias were proportionally very short compared to my femurs. But judging from the attached images that may just be an illusion because my calves and legs overall are very thick and stumpy.
http://imgur.com/a/JQCR7PV
Pics are NSFW I guess (in my boxers xD)
I'm 168-170cm
169cm wingspan
What do you guys think? Femurs or tibias? Personally I think a ~5.5cm on tibias would look the most aesthetically pleasing and well proportioned biomechanically. I don't really plan to lenghten over 6cm due to my short arms... sorry no xrays to measure exact lenght of femur and tibias yet...