MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Apr 18, 2015, 3:09 pm
#21

long tibias are much more attractive

also gives the illusion of being even taller than you really are.. function wise, doubt it matters much

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 18, 2015, 3:52 pm
#22

Long tibias look way better than long femurs imo, function wise long femurs seem to be advantegous in comparison to long tibiae.
Did anyone ever do both segments, but therefore less in each one? Like 4cm's femur and 3,2 tibiae? This way you could still keep the 0,8 ratio and have rather proportional legs as well. At least more proportionale than doing the same amount on one segment.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 18, 2015, 10:49 pm
#23

Having seen many LL before and after pictures longer tibias look better than having longer femurs however having longer femurs increase your stride length, tibias shorten it. Extreme lengthening's never look good on either section.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 8:11 am
#24

Quote from: Uppland on April 18, 2015, 02:36:12 PMI personally think femur is preferable both in forma and in function

Yes longer femur is definitely superior to longer tibias especially when you have minor lifts inside, IMO, example:

Long legs, where do you draw the line?

Long legs, where do you draw the line?

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 5:33 pm
#25

11CM on femurs:

Long legs, where do you draw the line?

Before:
Long legs, where do you draw the line?

And after:
Long legs, where do you draw the line?

I haven't formed a concrete opinion on the matter, but I think tibial LL generally looks better until 6CM and, for lengths greater than that, femoral LL looks better and more natural.

Here's another 11CM pic. It's not too bad in my opinion:

Long legs, where do you draw the line?

Here's the only proportionally nice case of 10CM on tibae that I've seen (strugglinghard):
Long legs, where do you draw the line?
Long legs, where do you draw the line?

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 5:39 pm
#26

Nice pics. 11 cm is an overkill in just one segment, but I can't say he looks bad.

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 5:41 pm
#27

his femues make his tibias look very short... not a nice aesthetic look..

longer tibias relative to femurs gives the illusion of added height

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 5:54 pm
#28

THUS MINOR SHOELIFTS!!!!

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 7:55 pm
#29

Quote from: Taller on April 19, 2015, 05:33:06 PM11CM on femurs:

Long legs, where do you draw the line?

Before:
Long legs, where do you draw the line?

And after:
Long legs, where do you draw the line?

I haven't formed a concrete opinion on the matter, but I think tibial LL generally looks better until 6CM and, for lengths greater than that, femoral LL looks better and more natural.

Here's another 11CM pic. It's not too bad in my opinion:

Long legs, where do you draw the line?

Here's the only proportionally nice case of 10CM on tibae that I've seen (strugglinghard):
Long legs, where do you draw the line?
Long legs, where do you draw the line?
Who was his surgeon?
Where is the source of this information?
How about his recovèry?
I thinnk, he looks nice
But my plan is only 6 cm femur 4cm tibia

Like (0)
Posted on Apr 19, 2015, 8:07 pm
#30

he doesn't look nice at all in the last photo

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics