old forum FULL STORY

Edit Post

It is difficult to have multiple profiles and still be honest.  I don't have a problem with a salesperson trying to link customers with doctors and profiting off of this service.  But he was manipulative and dishonest.  I also wouldn't have a problem with a patient writing a diary in order to attract more patients as long as it was honest.  I remember when I first saw Sysopyosis on 20/20 and believed that he was the man and old forum  was legit.  I wonder what kind of story they would write now.  They would write a story about fraud and deception.  He is nothing but a simple crook.

Cancel Save Changes

Edit Post

That fact that sysop is getting paid and recommending these docs, he should get in serious trouble for that.

Then sysop/apotheosis is promoting dr singari? Would we know about these docs if it were not for that site??

Dr sarin and Dr singari will be know in India but internationally on a LL website he is promoting those docs and getting paid for it! WTF!! Since the patients are aware of these low cost docs thanks to sysop/apotheosis he should be held liable for not only getting paid to promote them but if anything goes wrong as well. Remember he put dr sarin on the recommended list.

Is sysop/apotheosis a medical doctor? Why is he giving out medical advice? Why is he asking for donations?

Cancel Save Changes

Edit Post

We would need to look into the criminal laws of the country that is responsible. I do not know where Sysop resides but it was also matter what country the victim resides in.

In the United States, if someone is injured while under the influence of someone committing a felony, the person committing the felony is responsible for the result of the patient.

If Sysop was simply being a salesman for Sarin, then one could argue he would be liable for civil penalties if the procedure went wrong but I doubt it. Sarin is the one doing the surgery so he would be liable under his own medical standards.

However, Sysop claimed to be an innocent bystander in the matter of choice, while meanwhile its now provable that he was engaged in a for profit enterprise with Sarin and steered the patients to him.

That is fraud, which is a felony. If his felonious actions contributed to this fellow going to India in good faith and being injured, then Sysop is also responsible for any injuries one would suffer.

I can guarantee you a judge or especially a jury will not find Sysop an innocent bystander when he steered the patients without their knowledge to Sarin.

Cancel Save Changes

Edit Post

Greetings users of LL Forum,

I am what you might call a "concerned citizen" who frequents the website Encyclopedia Dramatica. Two days ago it came to light that sysop, someone you may know better as SysOp, filed a civil lawsuit against 20 "John Doe" defendants for libel, defamation, and copyright infringement. Five users of ED were named in the lawsuit, four of them sysops (not the user SysOp to clarify), and another five are users of this forum: Dameon, Sweden, orlandoflorida, and CRonnie7.

I looked through your forums to see if anyone here was aware of this, but the only reference to it I found was in a locked thread where someone had a screenshot which showed SysOp gloating about certain people "getting their day in court", much to the confusion of the thread; this was dated October 7th. I am unsure how ED was notified of this lawsuit, but it would seem those of you here have not been notified of its existence as of yet.

I feel like that's just playing dirty on Shahn's part, so I came here to give you all the heads up so that this does not broadside you down the road.

Here is a link to the publicly available pdf containing the complaint filing for the lawsuit in question: https://ia801402.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nyed.360902/gov.uscourts.nyed.360902.1.0.pdf

While I am not a lawyer, and anything I say should not be taken as legal advice, it is worth mentioning that this lawsuit is quite frivolous and pointless; but nonetheless can become an annoyance to anyone involved if left to fester unknown like Shahn would be prefer it did.

The ED users named in the lawsuit are essentially anyone who'd made edits to his article on ED (which can be found here should you require context of any kind: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Shahn_Christian_Andersen ), as four out of five of the ED users were not even involved in the writing of the article but made small janitorial edits to it. Therefore I'm making the assumption that whatever beef he has with users here is similarly ridiculous, and amounts to being a crybaby throwing money away on a frivolous court case.

Despite that his case will likely be laughed out of court, or never get any further since it states in the filing that they do not know whom the actual people are behind the 20 John Does, I feel bringing the existence of this case to your collective attention will help level the playing field, in a manner of speaking.

Cancel Save Changes

Greetings users of LL Forum,

I am what you might call a "concerned citizen" who frequents the website Encyclopedia Dramatica. Two days ago it came to light that sysop , someone you may know better as SysOp, filed a civil lawsuit against 20 "John Doe" defendants for libel, defamation, and copyright infringement. Five users of ED were named in the lawsuit, four of them sysops (not the user SysOp to clarify), and another five are users of this forum: Dameon, Sweden, orlandoflorida, and CRonnie7.

I looked through your forums to see if anyone here was aware of this, but the only reference to it I found was in a locked thread where someone had a screenshot which showed SysOp gloating about certain people "getting their day in court", much to the confusion of the thread; this was dated October 7th. I am unsure how ED was notified of this lawsuit, but it would seem those of you here have not been notified of its existence as of yet.

I feel like that's just playing dirty on Shahn's part, so I came here to give you all the heads up so that this does not broadside you down the road.

Here is a link to the publicly available pdf containing the complaint filing for the lawsuit in question: https://ia801402.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nyed.360902/gov.uscourts.nyed.360902.1.0.pdf

While I am not a lawyer, and anything I say should not be taken as legal advice, it is worth mentioning that this lawsuit is quite frivolous and pointless; but nonetheless can become an annoyance to anyone involved if left to fester unknown like Shahn would be prefer it did.

The ED users named in the lawsuit are essentially anyone who'd made edits to his article on ED (which can be found here should you require context of any kind: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Shahn_Christian_Andersen ), as four out of five of the ED users were not even involved in the writing of the article but made small janitorial edits to it. Therefore I'm making the assumption that whatever beef he has with users here is similarly ridiculous, and amounts to being a crybaby throwing money away on a frivolous court case.

Despite that his case will likely be laughed out of court, or never get any further since it states in the filing that they do not know whom the actual people are behind the 20 John Does, I feel bringing the existence of this case to your collective attention will help level the playing field, in a manner of speaking.

Lol SySOp is such a dork.