Hey guys,
Just wondering if LATN/LON is really worth lengthening with?
Especially if the risk of permanent knee pain is 30-50%.
From what I have read on this forum, people risk permanent knee pain regardless of how much they have lengthened.
Isn't it a better option to rather do pure external fixation and having the fixator on for several more months and not risking permanent knee pain?
Guys who have lengthened via LON/LATN, please share whether your having knee pain and whether the pain is sharp or subtle?
← Back to Information About Limb Lengthening
Permanent knee pain, is LATN/LON really worth it?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Feb 18, 2014, 11:18 am
#1
Posted on Feb 18, 2014, 12:11 pm
#2
Hey Kilokahn,
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry but what I am asking is the risk of permanent knee pain from the insertion of the internal rod into the tibia and not the duration of the external fixator.
Wouldn't it be better if a person wears the fixator for several more months then inserting a rod merely for the comfort and risk permanent knee damage?
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
What's the Most Popular Height Increase Surgery Name Used Today
zara_b93
6 replies • 23 minutes ago
Stryde nail results after 6 months: Are 6cm gains typical with newer femur lengthening techniques
amy_m
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Minimizing leg lengthening scars with silicone tapes and massage therapy effective
HeightHope
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Limb lengthening on Reddit: What are users' most surprising successes and failures?
amelia1997
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
How can limb lengthening at 13 impact overall bone health and growth plates long term
chris_b94
7 replies • 4 weeks ago
Limb lengthening at London Surgery Bedford: What's the average cost for a 5cm gain
jason_kim
7 replies • 4 weeks ago