Quote from: Sweden on March 01, 2015, 11:49:26 PMThere is something wrong inside your head.
Anyway. My own dream height is 188.
Today I am 178. I can only add 5 more cm.
Something wrong in your head. Not mine.
Anyway, why would women want to lie? If they want to lie, why six feet?
Why not say the ideal male height is 5'9 or something more average?
Quote from: meursault on March 02, 2015, 04:39:38 AMNo! Women think they are freaks, don't you see! They are 'too tall'.
I agree with this! 
Quote from: meursault on March 02, 2015, 04:56:48 AMWow, cute little surveys and bodybuilding forum posts. You're really showing your credibility. So much for your university education.
Opinion-polls and academic studies. Why would women want to lie? Why not lie 5'8, why lie 6' which happens to be Hollywood celebrities average height? 
I lol at guys's theorys about who female find attractive, too much sluthate guys
I actually think the opposite of what you said can be true...taller guys have it better with LTRs, but all men are closer to equal when it comes to one night stands. I say this because I've heard lots of attractive short guys say that they have no trouble hooking up, but can't get in relationships because women dont see them as relationship material (because those guys carry "subhuman" genes, and also they want a guy they would be proud to show off to their friends.)
Quote from: Hallijah on March 02, 2015, 07:58:00 AMI lol at guys's theorys about who female find attractive, too much sluthate guys
One opinion poll of women is very clear 
and, these people think women would lie in an opinion poll. Why didn't they lie 5'10? or 5'9? This is ludicrous they are experts (maybe they are women in their past life), they know what women want.. 
Source: https://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/07/11/ideal-height-56-woman-511-man/
Well, a world-class (top 30 in the world) university student quotes scholarly articles.
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Height+as+a+basis+for+interpersonal+attraction.-a015622157
(This was in my first post, in the bodybuilding forum)
Sorry if this pwns, together with my other arguments:)
QuoteDISCUSSION
These results aid us in understanding the conflicts in the past literature. If taller men enjoy a dating advantage, that advantage may translate into more and varied social experience, thereby enabling them to be more selective in the dating marketplace. Hence, Feingold (1982) was probably correct; taller men may indeed have prettier girlfriends given their social advantage of height. It is also the case that several other confusing findings now fit into place. Gunderson (1965) reported that naval personnel assigned to a medium-sized aircraft carrier (the sample size was not reported, but it was presumably large), expressed the opinion that 72 inches (183 cm) was the optimal desired height. Ironically, 72 inches is the mean height for an ideal male reported by the uninvolved females in this study. Moreover, the standard deviation of the preferred height is so small ([Alpha] = .20) that the preference for a six-foot-tall male is overwhelming. Of the 145 uninvolved females, 46 (32%) report that six feet is the ideal height for a male. QuoteThe Graziano et al. study (1978) is also brought into clearer focus. The researchers in that study were mystified when women seemed to prefer medium height men (5'9" to 5'11") to either short men (5'5" to 5'7") or tall men (6'2" to 6'4"). Graziano and his colleagues erroneously assumed that taller males are ipso facto more attractive. In light of the results found here, there is clearly a "ceiling effect"; at some point taller is not better for males. Graziano encountered the ceiling. Using the same categories proposed by Graziano, the same results may be replicated with the preference of uninvolved females; 3 (2%) preferred short males, 40 (28%) preferred medium height males, while tall males were chosen by 34 (23%). Note, however, that the medium category is the closest approximation to the real choice of six feet.
QuoteThird, there is apparently a "ceiling effect" in interpersonal attractiveness for the male. These data suggest that taller is not always better and that at some point, the advantage of male height may become a disadvantage. Obviously, that conclusion is tentative at present, but it is clearly a matter for future investigation.
Ceiling effect proven!
Quote from: Shor7Guy on March 02, 2015, 03:03:13 AMif you really thought 6foot was ideal you wouldnt fell the need to spend hours on end proving it to everybody. 6foot is probably the most you can reach cus of your arm span or sitting height, which is why your saying 6foot is ideal. Either this or your a troll.
One fundamental mistake you keep making is, when females are asked about looks, they'll say what they think is ideal in terms of LTR. Now, their pussy's think differently to their heads, cus their pussy's want ideal STR, not LTR. 6foot may be the ideal for LTR, but I can assure you a female will be more sexually attracted to a 6foot5 man than a 6foot one. Of course I can't prove this, cus there's no tests done. All I can say is I've been to a fair share of parties, and the taller the better is how it works, no limit. Here's some logic for you - it's been proven when girls want STR, they want the most dominant men (alpha male). Height is directly correlated with dominance, so by that logic, the taller you are the more sex appeal you have.
Ask girls who they find most handsome, and they'll say some guy like this at 6foot tall:
Now, go to a party, and the hotties will be banging a guy who looks like this at 6foot5: 
Anybody with life experience knows what I said is 100% true.
You win. First time anecdotal evidence from one person beats my anecdotal experience + opinion surveys + scholastic articles . Wow that is a high IQ person.
Quote from: FutureLengthener on March 02, 2015, 08:01:13 AMI actually think the opposite of what you said can be true...taller guys have it better with LTRs, but all men are closer to equal when it comes to one night stands. I say this because I've heard lots of attractive short guys say that they have no trouble hooking up, but can't get in relationships because women dont see them as relationship material (because those guys carry "subhuman" genes, and also they want a guy they would be proud to show off to their friends.)
True! 
Quote from: Sweden on March 01, 2015, 11:49:26 PMThere is something wrong inside your head.
Anyway. My own dream height is 188.
Today I am 178. I can only add 5 more cm.
There is definitely something wrong in your head. Going to India with Dr. Sarin. Now you want to go to the Ukraine. You said only Jamal, no one else. Do you watch news??? Have you heard of WAR? There must be something really really deeply wrong with you. Always picking the cheapest options. Thats how your legs gonna look like.
You must be logged in to post a reply.