Posted on Jan 13, 2021, 9:03 am
#1
Quote from: Coeus on January 13, 2021, 12:06:23 PMSo you mean Robert Pershing Wadlow was the ever richest man in the world?
Quote from: FormerKidd on January 13, 2021, 03:51:35 PMI hope you know this and are being silly, but just because something holds true in the average, does not mean that it is true for everyone. There are some poor tall people, just on average tall people make more money. They're also more likely to be promoted, which can help with earnings. Interestingly, this correlation between money and height only holds true for men.Cuz women are being discriminated all the time in most of occupations and for example women are more hardly promoted than short men even if they aren't short.So that's why you can't witness correlation holds true for women cuz women are so seldom promoted (rather than short men)that researchers can overlook the difference between short women's and tall women's earnings.
Quote from: Coeus on January 13, 2021, 05:23:48 PMAnd what's more,since you're considering LL,so you must have earning a lot of fund for it.Why can't you feel pride of it cause you have won a lot of tall people over earning?Why bother yourself with it.
Quote from: FormerKidd on January 13, 2021, 07:32:38 PMCorrelation is not causation. Meaning, just between two things are linked does not necessarily mean one causes the other. The paper suggests it's height during development that most strongly correlates with your earning, so increasing your height in adulthood may not help your earning at all (unless maybe your increased confidence allows you to get jobs or promotions that you wouldn't have gone for before).So...I'm on the same side with you..Why were there an argument?All I wanna mean is this thread is meaningless only to make height dysphoric suffers paler.
The fact that most people here are beyond the point where additional height might benefit them in this regard does not invalidate the findings.
You must be logged in to post a reply.