Posted on Aug 24, 2020, 10:43 am
#1
http://www.naturalheightgrowth.com/2020/08/17/medical-records-show-fact-gain-height-lsjlor-related-method/
Here's his last response to me regarding this subject:
Here's his last response to me regarding this subject:
QuoteRight now I'm trying to modify LSJL by using impact instead of clamping and impact closer to the epiphyseal line rather than at the end of the bone. I think the way to the bone is structured providing stimulus closer to the diaphysis may be more effectively at stimulating the entire bone including growth. And impact gets rid of a lot of issues with clamping. I was doing more impact loading when I grew.
I didn't like doing impact closer to the epiphyseal line because there was more nerve pain but the nerve pain could indication more stimulation throughout the whole bone.
Look at this image if the point of impact is at the cancellous bone the force may dissipate before ever getting the cortical bone thus no nerve pain but if the impact is closer to the cortical bone then the force/fluid flow/HP will go throughout the entire bone generating microcracks, stimulating stem cells, etc.
The reason that this didn't show up in rats may be because rat epiphysis never close(they become senescent).
Let me know if there's any confusion, more information. Expect more info at NHG as more testing is done.
