MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 4:30 pm
#11

Quote from: musicmaker on January 26, 2015, 04:10:53 PMBetween 1.90-1,95? OMG. I am a girl and I don't think so! Maybe in Sweden and other Scandinavian countries, where there are many girls who are 1.75 and taller, it's possible, but not in Southern Europe.
The average height required for male models is between 1.83 and 1.90, but, from my point of view, that's too much. I would avoid dating men as tall as that, because they would make me feel "petite", even if I am not petite, or won't be anymore, because I will be 1.70 after LL.
From an aesthetic perspective, I find that 1.83  is very appealing. My brother is 1.83 and women are mad at him, since he is also very handsome (green eyes, brown hair, athletic build...), but I don't like standing next to him, because, at my original height of 1.64, I feel short.  After LL that will be OK. What is the ideal male height?
Finally, I would like to say that, contrary to your beliefs, there are beautiful women for whom height is not as important as you indicate. I don’t wanna lie: being tall is important to make a girl feel protected and many girls wouldn't date men who are shorter or the same height than them. But if you have other qualities, anything within average is OK. You don’t need to be 1.80 or 1.90.


I've always wondered this: would a guy's height matter if he was strong. For example, Ed Coan was only 5'6, but he was the strongest man in the world during his lifting career.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 4:36 pm
#12

Quote from: musicmaker on January 26, 2015, 04:10:53 PMBetween 1.90-1,95? OMG...


I am from sweden actually.

Why do you think 183CM+ is too much?

From what I understand most women want to feel like a shrimp next to their boyfriend. If you think 183CM is too tall then you won't like swedish men very much.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 4:58 pm
#13

all the people that i see who are 190 or more looks really weird. they have freak proportions

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 5:07 pm
#14

Quote from: KirP1 on January 26, 2015, 04:58:51 PMall the people that i see who are 190 or more looks really weird. they have freak proportions


We'll all be even freakier after we've lengthened our legs.

Also don't think that's true at all, I see a lot of people that height who look just like everyone else only bigger.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 5:09 pm
#15

Quote from: Uppland on January 26, 2015, 05:07:34 PMWe'll all be even freakier after we've lengthened our legs.

Also don't think that's true at all, I see a lot of people that height who look just like everyone else only bigger.


it depends on how much you lengthen, most people with short height that do leg lengthening has better proportions even than those natural 190+

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 5:11 pm
#16

Greatest to least likelihood of getting women according to the man's height, based on articles I've read that were published by dating sites (and some "gap filling" to make a clear breakdown):

1. 6'
2. 6' 1"
3. 6' 2"
4. 6' 3"
5. 5' 11"
6. 5' 10"
7. 6' 4"
8. 6' 5"
9. 5' 9"
10. 5' 8"
11. 6' 6" and above
12. 5' 7" and below

Ok, so what's happening here... Women tend to prefer males that are 8 inches taller than them. Since the average female height is 5' 4", the preferred male height is 6'. After that, women will still prefer a taller guy to someone who is under 6', but after a certain point, they get "too tall" (after 6' 3"), at which point women prefer the taller than avg men (5' 10" and 5' 11") to the "too tall group". Finally, women prefer the avg height guys (5' 8 to 5' 10") to the very tall guys (over 6' 5"), and prefer the very tall guys to the short guys (under 5' 7")...

This scale is not confirmed by any source, but I inferred this scale based on numerous articles that I've read

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 5:19 pm
#17

I would say the sweet spot (that is realistic for most lengtheners) is that 5' 10" to 5' 11" range, followed by 5' 8" to 5' 9"

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 5:53 pm
#18

Quote from: newheights23 on January 26, 2015, 05:19:06 PMI would say the sweet spot (that is realistic for most lengtheners) is that 5' 10" to 5' 11" range, followed by 5' 8" to 5' 9"

I second this^ 80% of guys who are 5ft11 out there would lie anyway and say that they are 6'. My friend who is a legit 5'11 with well built muscles got more respects and attentions from girls than any of those clumsy 6'1 guys around. Thats why I don't understand when people try to risk their healths and money just to get to that "majesty" number of 6'. It is just a number. For this, I blame on US government and their failed attempt to convert to metric system like the rest of the world. If that ever happened, I am pretty sure that people in this forum will start talking about 1m8 more than anything else Lol.

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 6:12 pm
#19

You all are trying to convince yourselves, its clearly anything from 6'0 to 6'4. Since when 5'9 is better than 6'4?

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 26, 2015, 6:14 pm
#20

Quote from: Bruno Mars on January 26, 2015, 05:53:17 PMI second this^ 80% of guys who are 5ft11 out there would lie anyway and say that they are 6'. My friend who is a legit 5'11 with well built muscles got more respects and attentions from girls than any of those clumsy 6'1 guys around. Thats why I don't understand when people try to risk their healths and money just to get to that "majesty" number of 6'. It is just a number. For this, I blame on US government and their failed attempt to convert to metric system like the rest of the world. If that ever happened, I am pretty sure that people in this forum will start talking about 1m8 more than anything else Lol.

true, but I can reach 6'0 with 2 inches, so why not

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics