Quote from: JON SNOW on July 21, 2018, 09:07:01 PMagree
except the concept of alpha and beta behavior, humans are more complex, than gorillas and wolves, is bs
I know, I'm using it the way people use it on the internet these days to describe weak characteristics, probably should of just told them to have some dignity.
Quote from: edwardv6 on July 21, 2018, 08:22:01 PMIt's honestly pathetic that it seems a good amount of you are going to do/have done/want CLL for women. That's real beta behavior and being a little taller won't change that, you still won't be a chick magnet after CLL. The same crap goes on in old forums, go to a hair transplant forum and they'll tell you without a Norwood 1-2 you're not getting laid period, for example. Knowing how to communicate will take you further in life than a few inches added to your stature. How about you all work on taking care of yourselves, like hygiene, grooming, image [how you dress/fashion], etc. in the mean time, because no decent women is going to want a dirty "tall" lame with dragon breathe who don't know how to dress properly talking to her, never mind all the mental issues and insecurities some of you on this forum have. Being tall isn't everything and some of you need to get that through your heads.
I know your statement is a general one, but as I said in my post, I got women before LL. I got LL because I hated being short since I was a kid. If I had done LL for just women, I’d have never had what it took to get through the ordeal. But I can only speak for myself.
Quote from: YellowSpike on July 22, 2018, 12:26:12 AMI know your statement is a general one, but as I said in my post, I got women before LL. I got LL because I hated being short since I was a kid. If I had done LL for just women, I’d have never had what it took to get through the ordeal. But I can only speak for myself.
That's totally fine. Just wanted to give people something else to think about, especially with the direction this thread was heading. For the idiot, @KrP1, who said people under 160cm doesn't have a sxx life is probably a 160cm virgin himself who knows it all too well, except he can get laid if he brushed his teeth once in a blue moon but blames it on height, for example. As harsh as I've been posting on here lately, I do feel that saying BS like what @KrP1 said makes a forum full of height conscious people feel like CLL is not an option but a necessity and nobody should ever need to think that, and it's worst when made up numbers and stats are getting thrown around and people are blindly agreeing with it.
Quote from: edwardv6 on July 22, 2018, 01:07:20 AMThat's totally fine. Just wanted to give people something else to think about, especially with the direction this thread was heading. For the idiot, @KrP1, who said people under 160cm doesn't have a sxx life is probably a 160cm virgin himself who knows it all too well, except he can get laid if he brushed his teeth once in a blue moon but blames it on height, for example. As harsh as I've been posting on here lately, I do feel that saying BS like what @KrP1 said makes a forum full of height conscious people feel like CLL is not an option but a necessity and nobody should ever need to think that, and it's worst when made up numbers and stats are getting thrown around and people are blindly agreeing with it.
I think when we talk about height limitations on this forum, we assume that even if you aren’t otherwise a deadbeat (you aren’t terrible looking, have at least a decent job, some social skills, etc.)...height definitely can limit you. But the extent to which it limits you depends on how short you are. Of course, there are always exceptions and height isn’t everything...but it definitely counts.
Quote from: edwardv6 on July 22, 2018, 01:07:20 AMThat's totally fine. Just wanted to give people something else to think about, especially with the direction this thread was heading. For the idiot, @KrP1, who said people under 160cm doesn't have a sxx life is probably a 160cm virgin himself who knows it all too well, except he can get laid if he brushed his teeth once in a blue moon but blames it on height, for example. As harsh as I've been posting on here lately, I do feel that saying BS like what @KrP1 said makes a forum full of height conscious people feel like CLL is not an option but a necessity and nobody should ever need to think that, and it's worst when made up numbers and stats are getting thrown around and people are blindly agreeing with it.
KrP1 is completely right.
An 1.60 male don't have sexual life, at least not more than an 150kg woman has.
I don't know your height but being in an LL forum means you are not on with it. Like all of us here.
So, if someone is willing to do a so invasive and extreme cosmetic surgery without being sure that it will really help to improve his life, then he is totally stupid.
So if you don't think that height is so important and that 1.60-5 men are completely ok then it is good for you, although the reality is different.
But you don't have any reason to be here.
Quote from: edwardv6 on July 22, 2018, 01:07:20 AMThat's totally fine. Just wanted to give people something else to think about, especially with the direction this thread was heading. For the idiot, @KrP1, who said people under 160cm doesn't have a sxx life is probably a 160cm virgin himself who knows it all too well, except he can get laid if he brushed his teeth once in a blue moon but blames it on height, for example. As harsh as I've been posting on here lately, I do feel that saying BS like what @KrP1 said makes a forum full of height conscious people feel like CLL is not an option but a necessity and nobody should ever need to think that, and it's worst when made up numbers and stats are getting thrown around and people are blindly agreeing with it.
First of all , dont insult , because i dindnt insult You.
Second , i have been living as a 165 cm male and as a 172cm , so i know the diference that height makes in someone life better than You.
Third , I have been reading all your post , and everyone are to say that LL is not worthit , that nothing is going to change after LL and that people are blaming all their problems on height.
Let me ask You , what are You doing in a Leg lengthenig forum? Maybe You are trying to convice your self to not do the surgery and when someone brings You down to reality It Hurts you . But my friend , if You are here since one year looking info about a Major surgery is for something.
Quote from: Body Builder on July 22, 2018, 12:07:03 PMKrP1 is completely right.
An 1.60 male don't have sxxual life, at least not more than an 150kg woman has.
I don't know your height but being in an LL forum means you are not on with it. Like all of us here.
So, if someone is willing to do a so invasive and extreme cosmetic surgery without being sure that it will really help to improve his life, then he is totally stupid.
So if you don't think that height is so important and that 1.60-5 men are completely ok then it is good for you, although the reality is different.
But you don't have any reason to be here.
Sorry to burst your bubble, if you've stepped outside once in a while you'll know that's not true. Just because you couldn't get laid at 16x cm doesn't mean the next guy can't. But I take it on the odd occasion you do step outside, your height neurosis is on full force and makes you blind to everything but those taller than you.
Nobody knows whether or not it'll improve their life until after the surgery is done and have time to experience the results of it. Who's to say that person who was dead set on CLL got it and now has complications and now thinks having no complications was better than a few inches of height? This is the fxcking problem with this forum and I'll say it again, some of you are pushing your anecdotal evidence and BS numbers and stats as if they're facts. I just hope height is your only worry because God forbid you're balding hard and learn about the Norwood scale and continue this same cycle with a different body part.
Quote from: KrP1 on July 22, 2018, 12:43:14 PMFirst of all , dont insult , because i dindnt insult You.
Second , i have been living as a 165 cm male and as a 172cm , so i know the diference that height makes in someone life better than You.
Third , I have been reading all your post , and everyone are to say that LL is not worthit , that nothing is going to change after LL and that people are blaming all their problems on height.
Let me ask You , what are You doing in a Leg lengthenig forum? Maybe You are trying to convice your self to not do the surgery and when someone brings You down to reality It Hurts you . But my friend , if You are here since one year looking info about a Major surgery is for something.
You might not have directly insulted me, but you insulted others ~160cm people by saying they have no sxx life. I don't care for your anecdotal evidence because you are but one small man and I don't mean that in height so don't take that the wrong way because you seem a little sensitive. While you make assumptions about why I'm here, I'll be more than happy to reassure others on here your made up numbers are not facts.
Quote from: edwardv6 on July 22, 2018, 01:07:20 AMThat's totally fine. Just wanted to give people something else to think about, especially with the direction this thread was heading. For the idiot, @KrP1, who said people under 160cm doesn't have a sxx life is probably a 160cm virgin himself who knows it all too well, except he can get laid if he brushed his teeth once in a blue moon but blames it on height, for example. As harsh as I've been posting on here lately, I do feel that saying BS like what @KrP1 said makes a forum full of height conscious people feel like CLL is not an option but a necessity and nobody should ever need to think that, and it's worst when made up numbers and stats are getting thrown around and people are blindly agreeing with it.
I agree. I'm 1,60m and I've had more sxxual encounters with girls than some guys I know who are taller than me. Another boy (21years old) is about 1,70m and he is known for being a player. He has many many girls because he looks really good. In my opinion these percentages sound made up by a teenage boy. Google Jamie Cullum (1,64) and Daniel Radcliffe (1,65), they are neither tall, nor buff but they are talented. And I doubt that their girlfriends chose them because of money either because they have their own careers. Cullum's girlfriend is 1,83m tall and a model. She could have dated any one else.
Of course smaller men has more difficulties and are ignored more by women but saying there is no chance at all for certain men or spreading made up percentages around is pointless.
Shallow?Id not believe you would like ugly women wouldnt ya?
Since you need women to know your high income or good personalities or somethin es you should not risk being humiliated trying datings on dating websites Cuz except being tall and handsome anythin else is bs.Thats it.
You must be logged in to post a reply.