Posted on Nov 26, 2013, 4:03 pm
#1
Let me hijack this post for a sec to ask all of veteran LLers and prospective LLers with lots o knowledge. Of the three economical methods namely LON LATN and MONORAIL, which one of these is the best way to go?
This is my understand of these methods:
LON - cut back time, but risk of nail infection also since one begins with the intramedullary nail your bone will not come back as strong. Then you have to get another operation to remove nails.
LATN - save time but need extra 2 opertions, after lengthening and removal of nails. Lengthening period with external only.
Monorail - no bulky frames, no correction while lengthening (unless I'm wrong), consolidation period times 2 of lengthening period. The good thing is, no need for extra surgery to remove nails.
Please help add on or deduct pros and cons so I can pick a method to suit my needs.
* Above Post moved from Disobedient's diary, easier to track replies with a new thread.
This is my understand of these methods:
LON - cut back time, but risk of nail infection also since one begins with the intramedullary nail your bone will not come back as strong. Then you have to get another operation to remove nails.
LATN - save time but need extra 2 opertions, after lengthening and removal of nails. Lengthening period with external only.
Monorail - no bulky frames, no correction while lengthening (unless I'm wrong), consolidation period times 2 of lengthening period. The good thing is, no need for extra surgery to remove nails.
Please help add on or deduct pros and cons so I can pick a method to suit my needs.
* Above Post moved from Disobedient's diary, easier to track replies with a new thread.