The Change in Height Around the World Over the Last 100 Years

Edit Post

this kind of controversy should be avoid, everything have this opinion about it and nobody care about Zuckerberg
it's a bit hard to believe that he is 5'7 seeing how he get dwarfed with random basketball players (I don't know anyone in the picture while I know most NBA players and tall college players)
if he is 5'7 then all guys around him are 7'1 / 7'2 while it's the height of Porzingis and he is one of the tallest actual player

Edit Post

Quote from: Knik on March 20, 2018, 09:19:09 PMthis kind of controversy should be avoid, everything have this opinion about it and nobody care about Zuckerberg

why? didn't you hear it?




It's how nice you are, how much you love them that they will appreciate. Your personality.
Guy on the right wins because of how nice he is.
One has to only look at his life and see how it has been because of one genetic trait: height. Same thing happens for face, shouldn't be a surprise.

Edit Post

https://twitter.com/mattburgess1/status/841752843581296640
looks like he is in Avatar
average in NBA is officially 6'7 but some players are overlisted and they are all listed in shoes then it's most likely  6'5 / 6'6
and it's even less in NCAA
but here it looks like the average is 7'3, it's not possible
I have seen pictures of Shaquille O neal next to 5'10 5'11 guys and they were ok
http://www.goduke.com/SportSelect.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=4200&SPID=1845&SPSID=22727 according to the website of the team the tallest player is 7ft (213cm) others are more like 195-205 and college teams are usually cheating more with height so it could even be less

Edit Post

Oh god, the autists strike again.

Wasn't "GeTs" the dude who posted a pic of his face on the forum to prove he was "extremely good looking"? And then sent pictures of his dck in PMs to prove it was big? And don't even get me started on the "no woman will ever feel true love for Zuckerberg" bull , SMH.

Edit Post

Quote from: IwannaBeTaller on March 20, 2018, 09:30:41 PMAnd don't even get me started on the "no woman will ever feel true love for Zuckerberg" bull , SMH.

Hear, hear!

Edit Post

Good post by OP anyway, I was interested in countries with low height so this came in time..



The part later just eent full retard mode

Edit Post

For me the interesting stat is Yemen. I'm curious about it. Poverty can't be the main excuse as others countries like Irak or Somalia have a much taller average

Edit Post

Quote from: myloginacct on March 20, 2018, 09:09:02 PMMore like a question of IQ.

Hard to believe there are people who think Zuckerberg wouldn't be able to date women that a 6'2, good looking homeless guy could. And the only reason to choose the being latter is because you want to have a lot of sxx with good looking women. Which is still something Zuckerberg could do. Meanwhile, there's a lot of women who the homeless guy could never have - he'd be just a good looking, but unintelligent bum. Nevermind the billions in wealth he's missing. The choice is obvious.

Hard to believe you think he would.

Mark Zuckerberg could "have sex with good-looking women" if he PAID them, or if they were otherwise out for his money in some way (blackmail to prevent a scandal, sugar daddy, etc), but they would be physically disgusted by him.

As for the "tons" of women a homeless guy could never have:

http://www.etonline.com/news/178280_kendall_jenner_and_gigi_hadid_turned_this_homeless_man_into_a_male_model

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1295895/Rags-riches-movie-fame-homeless-man-Chinas-sexiest-tramp.html

https://hypebeast.com/2015/7/new-documentary-investigates-the-life-of-a-homeless-male-model

http://www.verygoodlight.com/2017/05/04/octavio-hair/

I'm sure there's "lots" of women who would genuinely consider Zuckerberg more attractive than these men. Lmfao. Get real. It's also idiotic to consider them "unintelligent" or "low IQ" just because they're homeless. IQ is a common coping mechanism for unattractive men who are unsuccessful with women. It's pathetic, childish, and little more than a made-up metric used by ugly men to feel superior in some way to attractive men. "I might be undesirable, but at least I'm smart!"

All of the most intelligent people I've met don't know or care what their IQ is, because they're too busy learning and being productive. These days "IQ" is only brought up by narcissistic MENSA losers and alt-right "race realist" mongrels.

I would say there's actually an inverse correlation between how much a person cares about "IQ" and how intelligent they actually are.

Well, the homeless guy still wouldn't have billions of dollars, right?

...Right?

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/jeremy-meeks-that-viral-male-model-felon-cheated-on-his-wife-for-rich-white-billionaire-heiress.551814/

LOL.

Edit Post

Uh, my whole point is there isn't almost anything he can't fix with his money. He can get surgery for his height, his face, his hair, get the best personal trainers, with the best nutrition and workout plans, all up to a point he becomes physically attractive - all while keeping his influence, wealth, power, and intelligence. Maybe he'll never be as physically attractive as the homeless guy you're imagining, but he will still be legitimately attractive. The homeless guy would most likely never get anywhere near his wealth or social influence, and IQ (or intelligence, if you prefer) can't be significantly increased. And no matter how you spin it, no CEO woman, or maybe a pioneering science researcher, would rather constitute a family with a homeless guy over one of the most powerful, successful, and richest men in the world. In the way I see it, it's simple logic, and you guys are stuck in your own reality. I can't make it any clearer than this. I can only assume you all would rather have easy access to as many "hot women" as you possibly could, or something to that effect.
Anyway, each to their own, and I wasn't the one to start with the ad hominem. I'll just agree to disagree with your views.

And I do generally agree with your points about IQ!

But this isn't what the thread is about.

Edit Post

Quote from: myloginacct on March 22, 2018, 05:40:36 PMUh, my whole point is there isn't almost anything he can't fix with his money. He can get surgery for his height, his face, his hair, get the best personal trainers, with the best nutrition and workout plans, all up to a point he becomes physically attractive - all while keeping his influence, wealth, power, and intelligence. Maybe he'll never be as physically attractive as the homeless guy you're imagining, but he will still be legitimately attractive. The homeless guy would most likely never get anywhere near his wealth or social influence, and IQ (or intelligence, if you prefer) can't be significantly increased. And no matter how you spin it, no CEO woman, or maybe a pioneering science researcher, would rather constitute a family with a homeless guy over one of the most powerful, successful, and richest men in the world. In the way I see it, it's simple logic, and you guys are stuck in your own reality. I can't make it any clearer than this. I can only assume you all would rather have easy access to as many "hot women" as you possibly could, or something to that effect.
Anyway, each to their own, and I wasn't the one to start with the ad hominem. I'll just agree to disagree with your views.

And I do generally agree with your points about IQ!

But this isn't what the thread is about.


C O P E