The difference between men and women

Edit Post

Quote from: Wannabegiant on October 01, 2014, 03:23:28 PMAs for wrestling, Cael Sanderson, Daniel Cormier and Yoel Romero are easily on the leve of Karelin in terms of wrestling skill, except for the fact that the wrestling competition is stiffer at their weight class compared to Karelins. There are simply way more talented wrestlers at that size.

we're not talking about skill - that is a sub-set. We are talking about absolute undefeatablility! Heavy weight champions and contenders can easily defeat champions of any other weight class despite a slight relative lack of skill. Period.

My point is that the most undefeatable wrestler of modern times of any weight was 6'4. A tall, powerful guy with mad skills is generally unbeatable by anyone

Skills are good, and loads of small guys have skills, but its the whole package that counts

Edit Post

Quote from: Wannabegiant on October 01, 2014, 03:23:28 PMAs for wrestling, Cael Sanderson, Daniel Cormier and Yoel Romero are easily on the leve of Karelin in terms of wrestling skill, except for the fact that the wrestling competition is stiffer at their weight class compared to Karelins. There are simply way more talented wrestlers at that size.

we're not talking about skill - that is a sub-set. We are talking about absolute undefeatablility! Heavy weight champions and contenders can easily defeat champions of any other weight class despite a slight relative lack of skill. Period.

My point is that the most undefeatable wrestler of modern times of any weight was 6'4. A tall, powerful guy with mad skills is generally unbeatable by anyone

Skills are good, and loads of small guys have skills, but its the whole package that counts

Edit Post

Quote from: GROWtalORdieTRYING1 on October 01, 2014, 03:44:03 PMactually that is incorrect. there are plenty of factual records, warrants against barons and masons, raids on castles to find corroborating evidence, the entire document was printed in the barvarian national paper all of which there are archived records for.

it was a huge scandal in the late 1700's. and the masons as a group were outlawed from entire countries.

you need to look for more information. it does exist. warrants and all matters dealt with for conspiracy/treason/subversion are locked into the archived records. and the letters from George Washington are all categorized and inventoried. specifically talking about the iluminati. just because you cant find any official records does not mean there are none.

ps I don't use marijuana. I use raw unpasteurized milk though for trace levels. I understand what you are saying about using it at different stages in life as a tool. and I agree with you. 

ps. humans are suppose to use marijuana. specifically for brain function to remain optimal. and specifically when in the growing years. and especially when you are a new born.

You take what i say to literal. Humans will not make the connection between the warrant on a mason and illuminati. Also the masons are not the illuminati just like the jews are not illuminati.

Edit Post

Quote from: GROWtalORdieTRYING1 on October 01, 2014, 03:44:03 PMactually that is incorrect. there are plenty of factual records, warrants against barons and masons, raids on castles to find corroborating evidence, the entire document was printed in the barvarian national paper all of which there are archived records for.

it was a huge scandal in the late 1700's. and the masons as a group were outlawed from entire countries.

you need to look for more information. it does exist. warrants and all matters dealt with for conspiracy/treason/subversion are locked into the archived records. and the letters from George Washington are all categorized and inventoried. specifically talking about the iluminati. just because you cant find any official records does not mean there are none.

ps I don't use marijuana. I use raw unpasteurized milk though for trace levels. I understand what you are saying about using it at different stages in life as a tool. and I agree with you. 

ps. humans are suppose to use marijuana. specifically for brain function to remain optimal. and specifically when in the growing years. and especially when you are a new born.

You take what i say to literal. Humans will not make the connection between the warrant on a mason and illuminati. Also the masons are not the illuminati just like the jews are not illuminati.

Edit Post

no your wrong. no connection needs to be made. because it was the Bavarian illuminati that also just happened to be the masons.

QuoteAccording to available documents, the Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria (commonly known as the Bavarian Illuminati) were founded by Adam Weishaupt (Spartacus) on May 1, 1776

your not dam well getting it....... they were not the masons who I "am just calling" the "illuminati"..... their actual name was the Bavarian iluminati and was written as such in the documents.

QuoteAlso the masons are not the illuminati just like the jews are not illuminati

this is an incorrect statement, what I think you meant to say is that being a jew or a mason does not automatically make you apart of any secret society. (illuminati is just 1 of many secret society's) they all inter relate and overlap with members. there is no 1 group. it is a collection of groups that form an financial oligopoly.

Quote. After founding the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776, Weishaupt was initiated into a Masonic Lodge of Strict Observance, Lodge Theodore of Good Council (Theodor zum guten Rath) in Munich early in 1777.

they are 2 groups with overlapping members.

I don't want to get into a history lessen here. just go read the national records.

Edit Post

This topic is so wildly off topic lol..

Edit Post

anyway getting back on topic.

I think the best method is to teach girls that just as they would not date a 4"7 man, we will not date a 600 pound woman.

explain to them that the equivalent of a man getting shorter is the same as it is for a woman to get fatter and fatter.

when a man is too short the girl your talking to wont date him, and likewise as a woman gets fatter all men have their cut off aswell.

its as simple as that. we are looking for the best person to mate with and physical appearance is indicative of superior genes.

no need to be all angry at each other when discussing it. I think just explain your point of view to women and it should be fine. they wont like being equated to short men, but it is the truth. and they will just have to deal with it.

Edit Post

Quote from: mrtall on October 01, 2014, 03:53:30 PMwe're not talking about skill - that is a sub-set. We are talking about absolute undefeatablility! Heavy weight champions and contenders can easily defeat champions of any other weight class despite a slight relative lack of skill. Period.

My point is that the most undefeatable wrestler of modern times of any weight was 6'4. A tall, powerful guy with mad skills is generally unbeatable by anyone

Skills are good, and loads of small guys have skills, but its the whole package that counts

Well currently the baddest man on the planet is 6'1, while some time ago it was Fedor who was 6'0. I understand that 6'0 is considered tall, but if your logic holds true, then the absolute biggest and tallest dude should be the most dangerous or unbeatable, which is not true at all. Fedor defeated giants like hong man choi that where 7 feet 2 inches tall, and Semmy Schilt that was 6'11. Those guys where skilled for their size too, but in fact their size actually works against them here, since they can never be as fast or coordinated as a smaller guy.

The same way a skilled 6'0 foot guy can have a definite advantage in fighting against a skilled 7'2 guy, a 5'10 guy can have a definite advantage over a skilled 6'4 guy. There are so many other factors in fighting that height is not nearly as important as you think.

Edit Post

Quote from: GROWtalORdieTRYING1 on October 01, 2014, 04:46:09 PManyway getting back on topic.

I think the best method is to teach girls that just as they would not date a 4"7 man, we will not date a 600 pound woman.

explain to them that the equivalent of a man getting shorter is the same as it is for a woman to get fatter and fatter.

when a man is too short the girl your talking to wont date him, and likewise as a woman gets fatter all men have their cut off aswell.

its as simple as that. we are looking for the best person to mate with and physical appearance is indicative of superior genes.

no need to be all angry at each other when discussing it. I think just explain your point of view to women and it should be fine. they wont like being equated to short men, but it is the truth. and they will just have to deal with it.

Women get way too crazy when anything about weight and their gender get brought up, its like hardwired into them.

Edit Post

QuoteWomen get way too crazy when anything about weight and their gender get brought up, its like hardwired into them.

you are right.
LOL if in doubt just call them the name of some really fat stereotype animal. and then start making animal sounds and laughing. if they wont listen to reason then just laugh at them lol at the end of the day as long as we understand what is going on that is all that matters.