Quote from: Thatdude950 on January 09, 2016, 06:12:58 AMWhat has Lluser claimed that people think is untrue/slanderous?
Edit - I read his old posts. I would say *all* doctors performing LL have had a subpar result at least once. It's an extremely risky procedure. So it's not controversial for him to say Monegal has had complications - of course he has. That's part of the game. What is controversial is suggesting that the Dr deliberately tries to hide them to the point of suggesting he has had *no* problems. This I can't comment on, but I can't imagine a Dr making such a claim.
This doctor tried to hide his bad results. Chsn was one of the patients who visited the guesthouse in October and he recognized it in one of his posts.
Quote2. About LLuser1....If he is the person I think he is, he was one of the guys that visited Mic in october.....He accuses Monegal for beeing dishonest in the sence that he witheld information about Musicmaker and other patients that had complications when Monegal said there was no complications......The truth is that Monegal said "I have never had a major complication like a non-union, but there is always a risk with surgery".......LLuser1 has in the past done surgery with one of the top surgeons who really screwed him up in one of the worst ways.. so for LLuser1 to be suspicous about LL doctors and feel that Monegal was dishonest that musicmakers case was not mentioned during our consultation, I can understand him....
To conclude: Everything that has been written about Monegal and his patients I believe is false, except the part when Monegal said there was no major complication.....Musicmaker I believe suffered some complications....And he should have told us about that case....
However with that said the complication doesent need to be the doctors fault....and complications can happen with all good doctors, the important thing is when a complication do arise the doctor knows what to do and tries to fix the problem as best as he can....
So it's true in the guiding tour he introduced prospective patients to ALL his current patients but musicmaker.
He said he had no patients with major complications but this girl has major complications and is still wheelchairbounded since 2014 because of multiple complications, obstacles and so on, and he didn't mention her. He said all his patients were fine and no major complications.
He took prospective patients to the clinic where there was a young guy doing quads, then to the guesthouse and introduced all patients but musicmaker (GLenn, Bohemia, Krp) Why? Hers is an horror story, one of the worst I've seen in these forums. He didn't want us to see that, because hers were true complications. There were problems with fractures, deformities, malfunction of implants, and for other patients misalignments, nerve issues and screw problems... He wasn't honest.
If we do further research we can find more fishy details about this case and other patients who weren't at the guesthouse at that moment. You ask me to back up my claims. I am telling the truth. How can I prove it? The doctor should prove that he isn't lying too (he is) but you don't ask him to back up his claims. Unfair at least.
You can ask patients. They are scared but perhaps they will tell the truth in the future.
This doctor seems nice and friendly but when you learn more about him I don't like some aspects of his personality. He becomes a totally different person, like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. He's unpredictable. He is very similar to Dr Betz in some aspects. In other aspects he is a totally new specimen for forums. We have never seen a doctor behaving like that in the forums.