Mersaut is right, 183 cm is the bare minimum, 185 cm is enjoyable, 188 cm is good, 190 cm is very good and 193 cm is god mod activated, every girls want your penjs and you dominate people which is a delicious feeling.
193 cm here I am!
Oh and mersault how tall are you?
Quote from: endomorphisme on March 01, 2015, 09:23:36 AMMersaut is right, 183 cm is the bare minimum, 185 cm is enjoyable, 188 cm is good, 190 cm is very good and 193 cm is god mod activated, every girls want your penjs and you dominate people which is a delicious feeling.
193 cm here I am!
That is not true as far as Asian countries are concerned. I wish I could be tall AND get girls.
If I were given a pill which would make me 190 or 182, I would choose 182 as I want to be a pretty boy and get girls.
Quote from: Shor7Guy on March 01, 2015, 09:02:15 AMItsMyLife, if you really wanted to be 6foot2, youd be welcoming to information and believe it, cus people believe what they want to believe. clearly you want to believe 6foot is too tall in your country, i doubt you think you can reach 6foot2, whether it be money problems, time consuming or proportions.
Dude, I surveyed so many guys (gay and straight) and girls. 6'2" is too tall for my country. I wish I can go there. I will be 6' at the end of my surgery and Prof Bagirov said that he recommends me 4 cm (2 inches on my femur). But later, he told me its better to do just tibia perhaps.
I want to be 6'2. But there are many problems. One of it is reduced attractiveness. In my country at least. I can easily handle another 4 cm, and the cost of 6500 euros is not much, or even less with Dr Solomin 
Quote from: ItsMyLife on March 01, 2015, 09:47:46 AMThat is not true as far as Asian countries are concerned. I wish I could be tall AND get girls.
If I were given a pill which would make me 190 or 182, I would choose 182 as I want to be a pretty boy and get girls.
you Re Not the center of the universe, 90% of the members registered on the forum are white and young, we'rd talking for Europe and the US, no one care of Asian countries.
OMG! Heated discussion out here!
Quote from: endomorphisme on March 01, 2015, 10:00:50 AMyou Re Not the center of the universe, 90% of the members registered on the forum are white and young, we'rd talking for Europe and the US, no one care of Asian countries.
Nope you are wrong, because I talked to a few Asians here (hongkong, Singapore)
And, what applies in Asia, should logically apply to Europe/USA as well, unless there are good reasons.
Asia (including Japan and China) is already the world's largest economy. So it is the center of the universe
QuoteThe Economy of Asia comprises more than 4.4 billion people (60% of the world population) living in 49 different states.[3] Six further states lie partly in Asia, but are considered to belong to another region economically and politically. Asia is the fastest growing economic region and the largest continental economy by GDP PPP in the world. China is the largest economy in Asia and the second largest economy in the world. Moreover, Asia is the site of some of the world's longest economic booms, starting from the Japanese economic miracle (1950-1990), Miracle of the Han River (1961-1996) in South Korea and the economic boom (1978-2013) in China.
As in all world regions, the wealth of Asia differs widely between, and within, states. This is due to its vast size, meaning a huge range of different cultures, environments, historical ties and government systems. The largest economies in Asia in terms of PPP gross domestic product (GDP) are China, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Indonesia, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Thailand, Pakistan, Malaysia and Philippines and in terms of nominal gross domestic product (GDP) are China, Japan, Russia, India, South Korea, Indonesia, Turkey, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Iran, Malaysia and Singapore .
Wealth (if measured by GDP per capita) is mostly concentrated in the East Asian territories of Hong Kong, Macau, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Brunei, and Taiwan, as well in oil rich countries in West Asia such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Iran, Kuwait, and Oman. Israel and Turkey are notable exceptions: both lie in the territory of Asia despite not often being counted as such, and are also extremely wealthy nations and powerful economies. Asia, with the exception of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore, is currently undergoing rapid growth and industrialization spearheaded by China and India, the two fastest growing major economies in the world. While East Asian and Southeast Asian countries generally rely on manufacturing and trade for growth, countries in the Middle East depend more on the production of commodities, principally oil, for economic growth. Over the years, with rapid economic growth and large trade surplus with the rest of the world, Asia has accumulated over US$4 trillion of foreign exchange reserves - more than half of the world's total.
Source: Wikipedia.
Quote from: ItsMyLife on March 01, 2015, 10:21:23 AMNope you are wrong, because I talked to a few Asians here (hongkong, Singapore)
And, what applies in Asia, should logically apply to Europe/USA as well, unless there are good reasons.
Asia (including Japan and China) is already the world's largest economy. So it is the center of the universe
we re talking about height, not economy.
I think you didn't get my previous message:I just said you were always referring to your country while most members live in the US and Europe and are WHITE So don't get mad when someone say 180 cm is not good enough because he is probably referring to western countries.
Quote from: ItsMyLife on March 01, 2015, 09:47:46 AMThat is not true as far as Asian countries are concerned. I wish I could be tall AND get girls.
If I were given a pill which would make me 190 or 182, I would choose 182 as I want to be a pretty boy and get girls.
Lets look at the figures:
http://www.heightdb.com/blog/ideal-male-height
ideal male height is 6'1. look at the peak. (so in my country it should be about 6 feet)
What have you got to say??
QuoteIt's shocking how suddenly 6'4'' is much less appealing than 6'3''. At this height an inch can make a huge difference to someones appearance. There are a number of disadvantages of being tall, and looking too daunting is one of them.
THe law of being too tall
Further confirmation that 6'1 and above are probably too tall:
http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/60-is-the-ideal-male-height.453495411/
Interestingly, this graph shows a "ceiling effect" whereby 6' is perfect, 5'11 is good, 6'1 is good, but really if you want perfection, it comes at 6 feet (my future height)
Its Based on dating pools
QuoteThis is the perfect male height. Accepted everywhere. Ideal for dating, sports, business, entertainment, and every other aspect of life
Too tall:
Makes kissing awkward (my girl firends said this)
Lower penis length to height ratio
etc
Second, in UK, 5'11 is ideal (2014)
https://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/07/11/ideal-height-56-woman-511-man/
QuoteThe survey also finds that for the average British man, a partner becomes too short at 4'11” and too tall at 6'.
Third, Dailymail (UK):
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2126093/Womens-idea-perfect-man-A-6ft--48k-year--beer-drinking-meat-eater-Audi.html
QuoteThe ideal male will also be 6ft tall, have short dark hair and smart dress sense - similar to that of U.S. X Factor host Steve Jones.
Fourth, http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=156380333
QuoteIn a study by Hensley (1994) women preferred a man who was 72 inches (183 cm) (6ft) tall as a benchmark. The preference for the six foot tall man is overwhelming, says Hensley. In his study, consisting of 145 females, 32 percent reported this as their preferred height
Interestingly, there seems to be a “ceiling effect” where tall males (over 6 feet) suffer a decrease in fitness. That is, women tend to find extremely tall men less attractive. This has been noted by several researchers. Women tend to prefer men of a medium stature over really tall men or really short men. In a study by Graziano et. al. (1978) similar results showed that men of medium height (5’9″- 5’11″) were rated as more attractive over shorter (5’5″- 5’7″) or taller men (6’2″- 6’4″), regardless of the height of the women (4’10″- 6’1″).
I didn't skew the search results. I just searched "ideal male height":https://www.google.com.sg/?gws_rd=ssl#q=ideal+male+height
Read yourself.
So what you gotta say to this 
?
This is validation that:
1. There is a cut-off height that is too tall. Probably about 6 feet in Singapore and 1 inch or 2 inch greater in UK/USA/Europe (or as the study shows, it may in fact be 6' or 5'11)
2. The girl friends and guy friends ( gay, straight, bi ) I spoke to, are CORRECT
3. Musicmaker and Diso are not the odd ones out. Yes women think that 6' is probably too tall, or it is at least ON THE EDGE of being too tall.
4. The forum members here have a totally distorted view of facts.
5. Hollywood heights are there for a reason. If you notice, most are below 185 cm (and Hollywood celebrities are generally taller than average persons). Same goes for K-pop, C-Pop and Taiwanese Pop and J-Pop!
So multiple sources say the ideal is about 6 feet, and it might be lower in Singpaore... maybe 180cm. But as I said, I don't care about girls. I wanna feel tall, and I think I can do so at 6 feet in Singapore.
CASE CLOSED 
(I won, hands down, slam dunk style)
You must be logged in to post a reply.
