I analised height this week, i just compared myself to other men in the streets of Paris based on eye level.There are ton of people who are 185-188 cm, but 192 cm and more is not that common.
As i said, if i wished, i could be 192 cm, which is the perfect height according to most people on
this forum and old forum but my goal is just 185 cm ( well, in fact it's 186-187 cm, but i'm not going to spend 60 000 euros, just for 2.5 cm).
So i don't see the purpose of being that tall, since most men are below 190 cm, even though a good proportion is near.At 185 cm you will never be towered, and you are taller than 99 % of women ( yeah, some women are 185 cm nowadays, but above that is rare), you will never look ridiculous, and according to my female and males it's kinda perfect.
females and males friends*
Okay sounds fair 185 cm is a decent height I personally would like to be taller but I'm not gonna go all risqué on the surgery just because of that.
Off topic: The site said "this account has been suspended" earlier today. Anyone know wht that's about?
Quote from: endomorphisme on October 12, 2014, 08:27:20 PMI analised height this week, i just compared myself to other men in the streets of Paris based on eye level.There are ton of people who are 185-188 cm, but 192 cm and more is not that common.
As i said, if i wished, i could be 192 cm, which is the perfect height according to most people on
this forum and old forum but my goal is just 185 cm ( well, in fact it's 186-187 cm, but i'm not going to spend 60 000 euros, just for 2.5 cm).
So i don't see the purpose of being that tall, since most men are below 190 cm, even though a good proportion is near.At 185 cm you will never be towered, and you are taller than 99 % of women ( yeah, some women are 185 cm nowadays, but above that is rare), you will never look ridiculous, and according to my female and males it's kinda perfect.
I would recommend wearing lifts then, because normally people are wearing shoes outside, so they're automatically 2-3cm taller, so therefore there are a lot of people who are around 182-185cm. Also you are comparing your eye-level to other peoples "head-top" (I hope you know what I mean), so from your point of view you feel shorter.
Well what I'm trying to say is that LL is not worth at your height (my opinion, I don't know you etc.), I think it would be better if you would your "LL-effort" into fitness for example. Because any women in this world would take a 183cm guy with a nice body over a 186cm guy with an average build.
I'm telling you this because LL is brutal, pretty much everyone underestimates it 
185cm is perfect, but I'm only 184cm in the morning. Always just short.....
Quote from: Uppland on October 11, 2014, 11:21:11 PMI'm a man same as you so I know where you're coming from but check this out:
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c350/mudhutwarrior/denise-milani-blue-bikini-balcony-p.jpg
This is a link to a model with unnaturally large breasts. Like a 6'4 man their size is more of a evolutionary disadvantage but still few men could honestly say they don't look sexy as hell. Just looking at them will release dopamine hormone to your brain and trigger an increase in heart rate and blood flow. When you get sufficiently aroused you will disregard almost anything in order to mate with her just because her large breasts is a sign of high estrogen levels, like a peacks colourful feathers is a sign of abundant nutrition.
Before you brand womankind "brainless" and "weak-minded" take a moment and try to be a little self-concious. We're all slave to biology it doesn't make us weak. Please, the internet doesn't need more misogony.
That is different. Attraction to big breasts is biological ; the height preference is not. The height preference is a societal construct; therefore, the same biochemical, evolutionary mehanisms of dopamine release, etc. are not at play. Besides, a woman can still be considered crazy hot even if she has very small breasts. A man while not be considered mainstream physically attractive if he is short.
I've heard evey argument in the book, my friend. There is really nothing you can say that I hasn't already thouroughly discredited.
QuoteThe height preference is a societal construct
height is a genetic evolutionary trait. it is a biological construct. you can only argue that it is exacerbated by society's social/psychological engineering. you can not say it is created by society's social/psychological engineering.
lol, 184 cm is not short polycrates, that's above average, and if you're 184 cm in the morning, you're 182-182.5 cm at night, so stop claiming 184 cm, it's not your real height.
At worst 184 cm is average...in the netherldands.
Quote from: ReadRothbard on October 13, 2014, 01:01:27 AMA man while not be considered mainstream physically attractive if he is short.
Are you sure? Think about Tom Cruise, Justin Beiber, Zac Efron, Taylor Laughtner, most members of one direction, Bruno Mars, Prince.
They are all below 175cm and their attractiveness have won the hearts of many females (even some males lol).
If height determined whether a guy is attractive then there would no such thing as Beiber fever or ladies labelling themselves as Directioners.
Quote from: GROWtalORdieTRYING1 on October 13, 2014, 06:50:53 AMheight is a genetic evolutionary trait. it is a biological construct. you can only argue that it is exacerbated by society's social/psychological engineering. you can not say it is created by society's social/psychological engineering.
There has never been any evidence to suggest that the height preference is biological; it is not universally considered an attractive trait.
You must be logged in to post a reply.