Quote from: TIBIKE200 on March 16, 2017, 06:04:19 PMI really wonder where are all these infinite 6'2 guys cause I rarely see guys that tall
New generation average height is 6'5 so 6'2 guys are everywhere.
ahhhh so true . their sons will be 6'7
Quote from: YourSpaceBoyfriend on March 16, 2017, 05:22:11 PMWhy are you assuming he is above average in every aspect just because he is 6'2?
Because he is tall and good looking. So in terms of looks he is above average in everything.
At the other hand, a good looking 5.8 man has a disadvantage of height so he is not above average on looks while the 5.5 guy, even if he is good looking he has a so big disadvantage that he can't compensate even if he is excellent in everything else.
So read more carefully what I write.
Tibike I didn't talk about 6.2 guys but for a 6ft guy. After all I don't believe that a 6.2ft has any advantage than a 6ft guy.
So I spoke about generally tall men compared to average and short men.
And there are plenty 6ft guys at least in my country. Thats why the average height of men is 1.78.
So that was the point of my above post. Tall vs average vs short.
Read more careful too.
Quote from: KiloKAHN on March 16, 2017, 06:10:58 PMNew generation average height is 6'5 so 6'2 guys are everywhere.
Pfft, more like 7 feet in the Midwest and some European countries. I'm 6'6" and feel so short walking around here, considering a foot on each segment so I'm in that sweet spot of 8 feet+ for picking up chicks.
On a more serious note, I've began to notice than many threads are ending up treading the line into being fully derailed into ridiculousness and more often than not Body Builder is involved - I'm not sure which I prefer, this or the inevitable Monegal arguments.
682 the ridiculous thing is to not have any argument against what drtruman and I are saying about the importance of being more than average in height and talk bs about 7ft tall and all these that I never said.
So if you think that height is not so important, go in anold forum and not here where we talk about breaking our legs to gain a few inches more to become average height or a little more. Not 6.2 or 7ft. At least me and the majority of people here.
So speak seriously with arguments or don't speak at all.
I share BodyBuilder's perspective.
I'm his same height (almost 5 feet 9), and I'm deep into dating and "seduction". Well, what I came to understand after years of wins and losses is that attraction clues all lead to aesthetics, directly or indirectly.
Height might be not enough, but makes everything easier.
You can surely argue that behaviour and attitude are major triggers for attraction, and I agree. But.. If we go back in time, let's say 40k years ago, who do you think that displayed those attractive behavioral features like dominance, confidence, boldness?
The bigger ones or the little?
What if one of the shortest in the "pack" tried to take the lead from the biggest? Who had more chances to win the fight?
Attitude is something that was usually "linked" to the fittest, so the brain evolved in ways that make ladies feel attraction for those behaviors.
Height, in dating and relationship, matters. A lot.
It's not all, but has two effects:
1) Enlarge dramatically your dating pool (taller girls, and sexier ones with higher "standards")
2) Makes everything easier. Provided you have decent looks, you passively attract girls. You don't need to "act", you automatically display dominance with your presence.
You can get hot girls even being average or below average. I am a bit below average, and I had some hot girls. But man, it's harder. You need to put in more work, and I clearly see (and they even told me) how some girls reject you for not being tall enough.
This is not a complaint. This is just the plain truth. You can believe it or not, just go out and experiment. Buy lifts, see how things change as you get "taller".
Easier. Height makes everything easier.
An there's no need to be very tall. Just above average.
How many guys over 6 ft 2 all around the world do you think?
Quote from: Eyeswideshut on March 16, 2017, 08:48:57 PMI share BodyBuilder's perspective.
I'm his same height (almost 5 feet 9), and I'm deep into dating and "seduction". Well, what I came to understand after years of wins and losses is that attraction clues all lead to aesthetics, directly or indirectly.
Height might be not enough, but makes everything easier.
You can surely argue that behaviour and attitude are major triggers for attraction, and I agree. But.. If we go back in time, let's say 40k years ago, who do you think that displayed those attractive behavioral features like dominance, confidence, boldness?
The bigger ones or the little?
What if one of the shortest in the "pack" tried to take the lead from the biggest? Who had more chances to win the fight?
Attitude is something that was usually "linked" to the fittest, so the brain evolved in ways that make ladies feel attraction for those behaviors.
Height, in dating and relationship, matters. A lot.
It's not all, but has two effects:
1) Enlarge dramatically your dating pool (taller girls, and sxxier ones with higher "standards")
2) Makes everything easier. Provided you have decent looks, you passively attract girls. You don't need to "act", you automatically display dominance with your presence.
You can get hot girls even being average or below average. I am a bit below average, and I had some hot girls. But man, it's harder. You need to put in more work, and I clearly see (and they even told me) how some girls reject you for not being tall enough.
This is not a complaint. This is just the plain truth. You can believe it or not, just go out and experiment. Buy lifts, see how things change as you get "taller".
Easier. Height makes everything easier.
An there's no need to be very tall. Just above average.
I agree, being above average probably does have some sort of an effect but you shouldn't get too caught up with this height stuff.
Quote from: Body Builder on March 16, 2017, 06:38:28 PMBecause he is tall and good looking. So in terms of looks he is above average in everything.
At the other hand, a good looking 5.8 man has a disadvantage of height so he is not above average on looks while the 5.5 guy, even if he is good looking he has a so big disadvantage that he can't compensate even if he is excellent in everything else.
So read more carefully what I write.
I did and looks isn't every aspect. Only now you have written "in terms of looks".
Quote from: 682 on March 16, 2017, 06:51:07 PMOn a more serious note, I've began to notice than many threads are ending up treading the line into being fully derailed into ridiculousness and more often than not Body Builder is involved - I'm not sure which I prefer, this or the inevitable Monegal arguments.
But muh height advantage hurr durr
Being above average is better than being average. In other news the grass appears to be green
You must be logged in to post a reply.